Literature DB >> 22584793

Comparison between SAPS II and SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a cohort of 103 Italian ICUs. Is new always better?

Daniele Poole1, Carlotta Rossi, Nicola Latronico, Giancarlo Rossi, Stefano Finazzi, Guido Bertolini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: More recent severity scores should be more reliable than older ones because they account for the improvement in medical care over time. To provide more insight into this issue, we compared the predictive ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and SAPS 3 (originally developed from data collected in 1991-1992 and 2002, respectively) on a sample of critically ill patients.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study on 3,661 patients from 103 Italian intensive care units. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Assessment of calibration across risk classes was performed using the GiViTI calibration belt. Discrimination was evaluated by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: Both scores were shown to discriminate fairly. SAPS 3 largely overpredicted mortality, more than SAPS II (SMR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.60-0.66 vs. 0.87, 95 % CI 0.83-0.91). This result was consistent and statistically significant across all risk classes for SAPS 3. SAPS II did not show relevant deviations from ideal calibration in the first two deciles of risk, whereas in higher-risk classes it overpredicted mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Both scores provided unreliable predictions, but unexpectedly the newer SAPS 3 turned out to overpredict mortality more than the older SAPS II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22584793     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2578-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  26 in total

1.  What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models.

Authors:  Michael A Babyak
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Validation techniques for logistic regression models.

Authors:  M E Miller; S L Hui; W M Tierney
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Community-wide assessment of intensive care outcomes using a physiologically based prognostic measure: implications for critical care delivery from Cleveland Health Quality Choice.

Authors:  C A Sirio; L B Shepardson; A J Rotondi; G S Cooper; D C Angus; D L Harper; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Outcome prediction in critical care: the Simplified Acute Physiology Score models.

Authors:  Maurizia Capuzzo; Rui P Moreno; Jean-Roger Le Gall
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.687

6.  Prediction of mortality in an Indian intensive care unit. Comparison between APACHE II and artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Ashish Nimgaonkar; Dilip R Karnad; S Sudarshan; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jack E Zimmerman; Andrew A Kramer; Douglas S McNair; Fern M Malila
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  SAPS 3 admission score: an external validation in a general intensive care population.

Authors:  Didier Ledoux; Jean-Luc Canivet; Jean-Charles Preiser; Joëlle Lefrancq; Pierre Damas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited.

Authors:  Andrew A Kramer; Jack E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  External validation of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 in a cohort of 28,357 patients from 147 Italian intensive care units.

Authors:  Daniele Poole; Carlotta Rossi; Abramo Anghileri; Michele Giardino; Nicola Latronico; Danilo Radrizzani; Martin Langer; Guido Bertolini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  19 in total

1.  Calibration strategies to validate predictive models: is new always better?

Authors:  Nicolás Serrano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Mortality prediction in intensive care units with the Super ICU Learner Algorithm (SICULA): a population-based study.

Authors:  Romain Pirracchio; Maya L Petersen; Marco Carone; Matthieu Resche Rigon; Sylvie Chevret; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 30.700

3.  Development and validation of a deep learning model to predict the survival of patients in ICU.

Authors:  Hai Tang; Zhuochen Jin; Jiajun Deng; Yunlang She; Yifan Zhong; Weiyan Sun; Yijiu Ren; Nan Cao; Chang Chen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 7.942

4.  Performance of Critical Care Outcome Prediction Models in an Intermediate Care Unit.

Authors:  Rebeccah M Brusca; Catherine E Simpson; Sarina K Sahetya; Zeba Noorain; Varshitha Tanykonda; R Scott Stephens; Dale M Needham; David N Hager
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.510

5.  Design and Performance of a New Severity Score for Intermediate Care.

Authors:  Félix Alegre; Manuel Fortún Landecho; Ana Huerta; Nerea Fernández-Ros; Diego Martínez-Urbistondo; Nicolás García; Jorge Quiroga; Juan Felipe Lucena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Hospital mortality of adults admitted to Intensive Care Units in hospitals with and without Intermediate Care Units: a multicentre European cohort study.

Authors:  Maurizia Capuzzo; Carlo Volta; Tania Tassinati; Rui Moreno; Andreas Valentin; Bertrand Guidet; Gaetano Iapichino; Claude Martin; Thomas Perneger; Christophe Combescure; Antoine Poncet; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2012: I. Neurology and neurointensive care, epidemiology and nephrology, biomarkers and inflammation, nutrition, experimentals.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Maurizio Cecconi; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J Randall Curtis; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Salvatore M Maggiore; Jordi Mancebo; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Performance of SAPS II and SAPS 3 in intermediate care.

Authors:  Juan F Lucena; Félix Alegre; Diego Martinez-Urbistondo; Manuel F Landecho; Ana Huerta; Alberto García-Mouriz; Nicolás García; Jorge Quiroga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting six-month mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury: usefulness of common intensive care severity scores.

Authors:  Rahul Raj; Markus Skrifvars; Stepani Bendel; Tuomas Selander; Riku Kivisaari; Jari Siironen; Matti Reinikainen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  A calibration study of SAPS II with Norwegian intensive care registry data.

Authors:  O A Haaland; F Lindemark; H Flaatten; R Kvåle; K A Johansson
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.