PURPOSE: More recent severity scores should be more reliable than older ones because they account for the improvement in medical care over time. To provide more insight into this issue, we compared the predictive ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and SAPS 3 (originally developed from data collected in 1991-1992 and 2002, respectively) on a sample of critically ill patients. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study on 3,661 patients from 103 Italian intensive care units. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Assessment of calibration across risk classes was performed using the GiViTI calibration belt. Discrimination was evaluated by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Both scores were shown to discriminate fairly. SAPS 3 largely overpredicted mortality, more than SAPS II (SMR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.60-0.66 vs. 0.87, 95 % CI 0.83-0.91). This result was consistent and statistically significant across all risk classes for SAPS 3. SAPS II did not show relevant deviations from ideal calibration in the first two deciles of risk, whereas in higher-risk classes it overpredicted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Both scores provided unreliable predictions, but unexpectedly the newer SAPS 3 turned out to overpredict mortality more than the older SAPS II.
PURPOSE: More recent severity scores should be more reliable than older ones because they account for the improvement in medical care over time. To provide more insight into this issue, we compared the predictive ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and SAPS 3 (originally developed from data collected in 1991-1992 and 2002, respectively) on a sample of critically illpatients. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study on 3,661 patients from 103 Italian intensive care units. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Assessment of calibration across risk classes was performed using the GiViTI calibration belt. Discrimination was evaluated by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Both scores were shown to discriminate fairly. SAPS 3 largely overpredicted mortality, more than SAPS II (SMR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.60-0.66 vs. 0.87, 95 % CI 0.83-0.91). This result was consistent and statistically significant across all risk classes for SAPS 3. SAPS II did not show relevant deviations from ideal calibration in the first two deciles of risk, whereas in higher-risk classes it overpredicted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Both scores provided unreliable predictions, but unexpectedly the newer SAPS 3 turned out to overpredict mortality more than the older SAPS II.
Authors: Ashish Nimgaonkar; Dilip R Karnad; S Sudarshan; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Isaac Kohane Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Romain Pirracchio; Maya L Petersen; Marco Carone; Matthieu Resche Rigon; Sylvie Chevret; Mark J van der Laan Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Rebeccah M Brusca; Catherine E Simpson; Sarina K Sahetya; Zeba Noorain; Varshitha Tanykonda; R Scott Stephens; Dale M Needham; David N Hager Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 3.510
Authors: Félix Alegre; Manuel Fortún Landecho; Ana Huerta; Nerea Fernández-Ros; Diego Martínez-Urbistondo; Nicolás García; Jorge Quiroga; Juan Felipe Lucena Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maurizia Capuzzo; Carlo Volta; Tania Tassinati; Rui Moreno; Andreas Valentin; Bertrand Guidet; Gaetano Iapichino; Claude Martin; Thomas Perneger; Christophe Combescure; Antoine Poncet; Andrew Rhodes Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Juan F Lucena; Félix Alegre; Diego Martinez-Urbistondo; Manuel F Landecho; Ana Huerta; Alberto García-Mouriz; Nicolás García; Jorge Quiroga Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rahul Raj; Markus Skrifvars; Stepani Bendel; Tuomas Selander; Riku Kivisaari; Jari Siironen; Matti Reinikainen Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 9.097