Daniel Fischer1, Jeffrey Sorensen2, Gabriel V Fontaine3,4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine Pharmacy, University of Colorado Hospital, 12605, E 16th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. dan.fischer.rx@gmail.com. 2. Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, 5121 South Cottonwood St, Murray, UT, 84107, USA. 3. Department of Pharmacy, Intermountain Medical Center, 5171 South Cottonwood St, Murray, UT, 84107, USA. 4. Neurosciences Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, 5171 South Cottonwood St, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) produce a more rapid and complete INR correction compared with 3-factor PCC in patients receiving warfarin. It is unknown if this improves clinical outcomes in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients presenting with warfarin-associated ICH reversed with either 4- or 3-factor PCC. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, discharge location, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital-free days, INR reversal, and thromboembolic (TE) events at 90 days. Each was analyzed using regression analysis. Continuous and binary outcomes were analyzed using linear and logistic regression, respectively, while ordinal regression was used for discharge location. RESULTS: Of the 103 patients, 63 received 4-factor PCC. Median age was 79 years [interquartile intervals(IQI 73-84)], median presenting INR was 2.7 (2.2-3.3), and presenting ICH was intraparenchymal in 51% of patients. In-hospital and 30-day mortality were 25 and 35%, respectively. In-hospital mortality was greater among those who received 4-factor PCC, yet was not statistically significant (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.59-9.4, p = 0.26), as having Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤8 explained most of the difference (OR 48, 95% CI 14-219, p <0.001). The effect of 4-factor PCC was not statistically significant in any of the secondary analyses. Crude rates of TE events were higher in the 4-factor PCC group (19 vs. 10%), though not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality was not improved with the use of 4- versus 3-factor PCC in the emergent reversal of warfarin-associated ICH. Secondary clinical outcomes were similarly nonsignificant.
BACKGROUND: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) produce a more rapid and complete INR correction compared with 3-factor PCC in patients receiving warfarin. It is unknown if this improves clinical outcomes in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients presenting with warfarin-associated ICH reversed with either 4- or 3-factor PCC. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, discharge location, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital-free days, INR reversal, and thromboembolic (TE) events at 90 days. Each was analyzed using regression analysis. Continuous and binary outcomes were analyzed using linear and logistic regression, respectively, while ordinal regression was used for discharge location. RESULTS: Of the 103 patients, 63 received 4-factor PCC. Median age was 79 years [interquartile intervals(IQI 73-84)], median presenting INR was 2.7 (2.2-3.3), and presenting ICH was intraparenchymal in 51% of patients. In-hospital and 30-day mortality were 25 and 35%, respectively. In-hospital mortality was greater among those who received 4-factor PCC, yet was not statistically significant (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.59-9.4, p = 0.26), as having Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤8 explained most of the difference (OR 48, 95% CI 14-219, p <0.001). The effect of 4-factor PCC was not statistically significant in any of the secondary analyses. Crude rates of TE events were higher in the 4-factor PCC group (19 vs. 10%), though not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality was not improved with the use of 4- versus 3-factor PCC in the emergent reversal of warfarin-associated ICH. Secondary clinical outcomes were similarly nonsignificant.
Authors: Joshua N Goldstein; Majed A Refaai; Truman J Milling; Brandon Lewis; Robert Goldberg-Alberts; Bruce A Hug; Ravi Sarode Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dar Dowlatshahi; Kenneth S Butcher; Negar Asdaghi; Susan Nahirniak; Manya L Bernbaum; Antonio Giulivi; Jason K Wasserman; Man-Chiu Poon; Shelagh B Coutts Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: J Claude Hemphill; Steven M Greenberg; Craig S Anderson; Kyra Becker; Bernard R Bendok; Mary Cushman; Gordon L Fung; Joshua N Goldstein; R Loch Macdonald; Pamela H Mitchell; Phillip A Scott; Magdy H Selim; Daniel Woo Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Scott C Woller; Scott M Stevens; Steven Towner; Jeff Olson; Paige Christensen; Sharon Hamilton; Laurel Newman; Loren Mott; Ping Hu; Kimberly D Brunisholz; Yenh Long; Jim Lloyd; R Scott Evans; Wayne Cannon; C Greg Elliott Journal: Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 2.389
Authors: Adrian R Parry-Jones; Mario Di Napoli; Joshua N Goldstein; Floris H B M Schreuder; Sami Tetri; Turgut Tatlisumak; Bernard Yan; Koen M van Nieuwenhuizen; Nelly Dequatre-Ponchelle; Matthew Lee-Archer; Solveig Horstmann; Duncan Wilson; Fulvio Pomero; Luca Masotti; Christine Lerpiniere; Daniel Agustin Godoy; Abigail S Cohen; Rik Houben; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Paolo Pennati; Luigi Fenoglio; David Werring; Roland Veltkamp; Edith Wood; Helen M Dewey; Charlotte Cordonnier; Catharina J M Klijn; Fabrizio Meligeni; Stephen M Davis; Juha Huhtakangas; Julie Staals; Jonathan Rosand; Atte Meretoja Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Alan S Go; Thomas K Leong; Sue Hee Sung; Rong Wei; Teresa N Harrison; Nigel Gupta; Nicole Baker; Brahm Goldstein; Quazi Ataher; Matthew D Solomon; Kristi Reynolds Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 5.221