Literature DB >> 8007973

Repression of basal transcription by HMG2 is counteracted by TFIIH-associated factors in an ATP-dependent process.

G Stelzer1, A Goppelt, F Lottspeich, M Meisterernst.   

Abstract

A basal repressor of class II gene transcription was identified, purified, and found to be identical to nonhistone chromosomal protein HMG2. HMG2 was shown to inhibit basal transcription under conditions in which transcription templates form soluble complexes with HMG2. Order-of-addition experiments clearly revealed that HMG2 acted after assembly of a TBP-TFIIA-promoter complex and before formation of the fourth phosphodiester bond by RNA polymerase II. Subsequently, an activity that efficiently counteracted repression of transcription by HMG2 in both TBP- and TFIID-containing transcription systems was isolated. Several lines of evidence suggested that antirepression was mediated by a TFIIH-associated factor. The antirepressor first coeluted with TFIIH, was depleted from this fraction by antibodies directed against the TFIIH subunit p62, was dependent on either ATP or dATP, and then was inhibited by the ATP analogs AMP-PNP and ATP gamma S. Relief of HMG2-mediated repression as well as basal promoter function of TFIIH may involve a helicase that coelutes with TFIIH and displays similar nucleotide specificities. Taken together, these data suggest novel consequences of chromatin-associated HMG proteins and they provide direct evidence for a role of TFIIH-associated enzymes in ATP-dependent antirepression of nonhistone chromosomal proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8007973      PMCID: PMC358844          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4712-4721.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  45 in total

Review 1.  Structural features of the HMG chromosomal proteins and their genes.

Authors:  M Bustin; D A Lehn; D Landsman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1990-07-30

Review 2.  Nucleoside phosphorothioates.

Authors:  F Eckstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 23.643

3.  High mobility group proteins 1 and 2 stimulate transcription in vitro by RNA polymerases II and III.

Authors:  D J Tremethick; P L Molloy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1986-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Preferential affinity of high molecular weight high mobility group non-histone chromatin proteins for single-stranded DNA.

Authors:  P J Isackson; J L Fishback; D L Bidney; G R Reeck
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1979-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  High mobility group proteins 1 and 2 stimulate binding of a specific transcription factor to the adenovirus major late promoter.

Authors:  F Watt; P L Molloy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Enrichment of transcribed and newly replicated DNA in soluble chromatin released from nuclei by mild micrococcal nuclease digestion.

Authors:  S A Chambers; R L Rill
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1984-06-16

7.  Structure of the nucleosome core particle at 7 A resolution.

Authors:  T J Richmond; J T Finch; B Rushton; D Rhodes; A Klug
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Oct 11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Interaction of a gene-specific transcription factor with the adenovirus major late promoter upstream of the TATA box region.

Authors:  M Sawadogo; R G Roeder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Interaction between domains in chromosomal protein HMG-1.

Authors:  M Carballo; P Puigdomènech; T Tancredi; J Palau
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Concentrations of high-mobility-group proteins in the nucleus and cytoplasm of several rat tissues.

Authors:  L Kuehl; B Salmond; L Tran
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of DNA-dependent activities by the functional motifs of the high-mobility-group chromosomal proteins.

Authors:  M Bustin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Analysis of the open region of RNA polymerase II transcription complexes in the early phase of elongation.

Authors:  U Fiedler; H T Timmers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  A new screen for protein interactions reveals that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group proteins Nhp6A/B are involved in the regulation of the GAL1 promoter.

Authors:  H Laser; C Bongards; J Schüller; S Heck; N Johnsson; N Lehming
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  General transcriptional coactivator PC4 activates p53 function.

Authors:  Sourav Banerjee; B R Prashanth Kumar; Tapas K Kundu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Interaction of PC4 with melted DNA inhibits transcription.

Authors:  S Werten; G Stelzer; A Goppelt; F M Langen; P Gros; H T Timmers; P C Van der Vliet; M Meisterernst
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Three transitions in the RNA polymerase II transcription complex during initiation.

Authors:  F C Holstege; U Fiedler; H T Timmers
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  A conserved tissue-specific structure at a human T-cell receptor beta-chain core promoter.

Authors:  J P Halle; P Haus-Seuffert; C Woltering; G Stelzer; M Meisterernst
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Isolation of cDNAs encoding novel transcription coactivators p52 and p75 reveals an alternate regulatory mechanism of transcriptional activation.

Authors:  H Ge; Y Si; R G Roeder
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-11-16       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  RNA polymerase II C-terminal heptarepeat domain Ser-7 phosphorylation is established in a mediator-dependent fashion.

Authors:  Stefan Boeing; Caroline Rigault; Martin Heidemann; Dirk Eick; Michael Meisterernst
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Promoter-proximal stalling results from the inability to recruit transcription factor IIH to the transcription complex and is a regulated event.

Authors:  K P Kumar; S Akoulitchev; D Reinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.