Literature DB >> 8006839

Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition.

M Kern1, V P Thompson.   

Abstract

Silica coating can improve bonding of resin to glass-infiltrated aluminum oxide ceramic (In-Ceram), and sandblasting is a pretreatment to thermal silica coating (Silicoater MD system) or a tribochemical coating process (Rocatec system). This study evaluated the effects of sandblasting and coating techniques on volume loss, surface morphology, and surface composition of In-Ceram ceramic. Volume loss through sandblasting was 36 times less for In-Ceram ceramic compared with a feldspathic glass ceramic (IPS-Empress), and sandblasting of In-Ceram ceramic did not change its surface composition. After tribochemical coating with the Rocatec system, a layer of small silica particles remained that elevated the silica content to 19.7 weight percentage (energy-dispersive spectroscopy). Ultrasonic cleaning removed loose silica particles from the surface and decreased the silica content to 15.8 weight percentage, which suggested firm attachment of most of the silica layer to the surface. After treatment with the Silicoater MD system, the silica content increased only slightly from that of the sandblasted specimen. The silica layer created by these systems differs greatly in both morphology and thickness, which could result in different bond strengths. Sandblasting of all ceramic clinical restorations with feldspathic glass materials should be avoided, but for In-Ceram ceramic the volume loss was within an acceptable range and similar to that of noble metals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8006839     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90182-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  28 in total

Review 1.  All-ceramic crowns: bonding or cementing?

Authors:  Peter Pospiech
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The effect of different surface treatments on roughness and bond strength in low fusing ceramics.

Authors:  Haluk Baris Kara; A Nilgun Ozturk; Filiz Aykent; Ozlem Koc; Bora Ozturk
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Clinically used adhesive ceramic bonding methods: a survey in 2007, 2011, and in 2015.

Authors:  K Klosa; G Meyer; M Kern
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now?

Authors:  Jeffrey Y Thompson; Brian R Stoner; Jeffrey R Piascik; Robert Smith
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems.

Authors:  Tevfik Yavuz; Erhan Dilber; Haluk Baris Kara; Ali Riza Tuncdemir; A Nilgun Ozturk
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 6.  The Effect of Resin Bonding on Long-Term Success of High-Strength Ceramics.

Authors:  M B Blatz; M Vonderheide; J Conejo
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Bond Strength of Fiber Posts to Composite Core: Effect of Surface Treatment With Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Thermocycling.

Authors:  Sedighe Sadat Hashemikamangar; Masoome Hasanitabatabaee; Saman Kalantari; Mehrzad Gholampourdehaky; Ladan Ranjbaromrani; Hooman Ebrahimi
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-26

8.  In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Different Surface Treatments of a Hybrid Ceramic on the Microtensile Bond Strength to a Luting Resin Cement.

Authors:  Fariba Motevasselian; Zahra Amiri; Nasim Chiniforush; Mansoreh Mirzaei; Van Thompson
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-01

9.  Microtensile bond strength of composite resin to glass-infiltrated alumina composite conditioned with Er,Cr:YSGG laser.

Authors:  Carlos de Paula Eduardo; Marina Stella Bello-Silva; Simone Gonçalves Moretto; Paulo Francisco Cesar; Patricia Moreira de Freitas
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Shear bond strength of brackets on restorative materials: Comparison on various dental restorative materials using the universal primer Monobond® Plus.

Authors:  Thomas Ebert; Laura Elsner; Ursula Hirschfelder; Sebastian Hanke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.