Literature DB >> 31875122

In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Different Surface Treatments of a Hybrid Ceramic on the Microtensile Bond Strength to a Luting Resin Cement.

Fariba Motevasselian1, Zahra Amiri2, Nasim Chiniforush3, Mansoreh Mirzaei1, Van Thompson4.   

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of different surface treatments of a hybrid ceramic, Vita Enamic, on the micro-tensile bond strength (µ-TBS) to resin cement.
Methods: Ten blocks (3×10×8 mm) were retrieved from the original blocks and divided into 5 groups according to the different surface treatments performed: Groups 1: 35% acid phosphoric for 60 seconds (PA); group 2: Sandblasting with 50 µm Al2 O3 particles for 10 seconds (SB); groups 3: 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 seconds (HF), group 4: The Er:YAG laser (2 W, 10 Hz) (ER1), group 5: The Er:YAG laser (3 W, 10 Hz) (ER2). All treated surfaces were salinized and the blocks with similar surface treatments were bonded together using a dual-cured resin cement and light-cured. After 24-hour storage in water, the blocks were cut into beams (1 mm2). Half of the specimens in each group (n=16) were tested immediately and the rest were subjected to thermocycling between 5°C and 55°C for 6000 cycles before the µ-TBS test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests and the significance level was set at 0.05. The failure mode was evaluated by using a stereomicroscope.
Results: The µ-TBS was clearly influenced by surface treatment methods (P < 0.001) and thermocycling significantly decreased the bond strength values in all groups (P = 0.007). The highest value (66.07 MPa ± 11.3) was obtained for the HF groups with no thermocycling and the lowest values were observed in the laser groups with no significant difference among different irradiation parameters. Adhesive failure was mainly observed in the PA and SB groups while mixed failure was predominantly shown in the laser and HF groups.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that surface treatment of VE with HF and salinization could improve the bond strength to a dual-cured resin cement, and Er:YAG laser irradiation with the evaluated parameters did not promote the adhesion of the resin cement to VE.
Copyright © 2019 J Lasers Med Sci.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Er:YAG laser; Hybrid ceramic; Surface treatment; Tensile strength

Year:  2019        PMID: 31875122      PMCID: PMC6885908          DOI: 10.15171/jlms.2019.48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 2008-9783


  34 in total

Review 1.  Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now?

Authors:  Jeffrey Y Thompson; Brian R Stoner; Jeffrey R Piascik; Robert Smith
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Composite filling removal with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser: morphological analyses.

Authors:  Alessandra M Correa-Afonso; Regina G Palma-Dibb; Jesus Djalma Pécora
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials.

Authors:  Stefano Gracis; Van P Thompson; Jonathan L Ferencz; Nelson R F A Silva; Estevam A Bonfante
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to a CAD/CAM Restorative Material.

Authors:  Kubilay Barutcigil; Çağatay Barutcigil; Esra Kul; Mehmet Mustafa Özarslan; Ulviye Sebnem Buyukkaplan
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems.

Authors:  Tevfik Yavuz; Erhan Dilber; Haluk Baris Kara; Ali Riza Tuncdemir; A Nilgun Ozturk
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks.

Authors:  Kumiko Yoshihara; Noriyuki Nagaoka; Yukinori Maruo; Goro Nishigawa; Masao Irie; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material.

Authors:  Alvaro Della Bona; Pedro H Corazza; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Shear bond strength of repair composite resin to an acid-etched and a laser-irradiated feldspathic ceramic surface.

Authors:  Musa Samil Akyil; Asude Yilmaz; Osman F Karaalioğlu; Zeynep Y Duymuş
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis.

Authors:  Azam Valian; Elham Moravej-Salehi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  The effect of sandblasting duration on the bond durability of dual-cure adhesive cement to CAD/CAM resin restoratives.

Authors:  Neslihan Tekçe; Safa Tuncer; Mustafa Demirci
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 1.904

View more
  2 in total

1.  Shear Bond Strength of a Direct Resin Composite to CAD-CAM Composite Blocks: Relative Contribution of Micromechanical and Chemical Block Surface Treatment.

Authors:  Vincent Fouquet; François Lachard; Sarah Abdel-Gawad; Elisabeth Dursun; Jean-Pierre Attal; Philippe François
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Effect of sandblasting and/or priming treatment on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to CAD/CAM blocks.

Authors:  Yuko Nagasawa; Yoshikazu Eda; Hirotaka Shigeta; Marco Ferrari; Hiroshi Nakajima; Yasushi Hibino
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.634

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.