Literature DB >> 8001907

Genetic structure of the Utah Mormons: comparison of results based on RFLPs, blood groups, migration matrices, isonymy, and pedigrees.

E O'Brien1, A R Rogers, J Beesley, L B Jorde.   

Abstract

The genetic structure of the Utah Mormon population is examined using 25 blood group and 47 RFLP alleles obtained from 442 subjects living in 8 geographic subdivisions. Nei's GST was 0.013 (p < 0.002) for the RFLP data and 0.012 (p > 0.4) for the blood group data, showing that only 1% of the genetic variance in this population can be attributed to subdivision effects. A comparison of intersubdivision distance matrices based on blood groups, RFLPs, migration matrices, isonymy, and pedigrees shows that genetic distances have relatively low and nonsignificant correlations with the other three types of data. However, the correlations based on RFLPs are considerably higher than those based on blood groups. Relationship matrices based on interindividual allele sharing were compared with known genealogical kinship coefficients between each pair of individuals. The correlation between the blood group and RFLP relationship matrices was small but marginally significant using the Mantel test (r = 0.014, p < 0.06). The RFLP relationship matrix correlated more highly with genealogical kinship than did the blood group relationship matrix (r = 0.023, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.012, p < 0.001, respectively). These correlations increased by approximately one order of magnitude when pairs of subjects having zero kinship coefficients were excluded. These results show that genetic distances derived from RFLPs correlate more strongly with other types of kinship than do distances based on blood groups. This probably reflects the fact that RFLPs are more neutral, have frequencies that are more accurately estimated, and contain more information about DNA sequence variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8001907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Biol        ISSN: 0018-7143            Impact factor:   0.553


  13 in total

1.  Population-based analysis of Alzheimer's disease risk alleles implicates genetic interactions.

Authors:  Mark T W Ebbert; Perry G Ridge; Andrew R Wilson; Aaron R Sharp; Matthew Bailey; Maria C Norton; JoAnn T Tschanz; Ronald G Munger; Christopher D Corcoran; John S K Kauwe
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Sex Differences in Risk for Alzheimer's Disease Related to Neurotrophin Gene Polymorphisms: The Cache County Memory Study.

Authors:  Joshua Matyi; JoAnn T Tschanz; Gail B Rattinger; Chelsea Sanders; Elizabeth K Vernon; Chris Corcoran; John S K Kauwe; Mona Buhusi
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Frequency of familial colon cancer and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) in a large population database.

Authors:  Richard A Kerber; Deborah W Neklason; Wade S Samowitz; Randall W Burt
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Nucleotide diversity and haplotype structure of the human angiotensinogen gene in two populations.

Authors:  Toshiaki Nakajima; Lynn B Jorde; Tomoaki Ishigami; Satoshi Umemura; Mitsuru Emi; Jean-Marc Lalouel; Ituro Inoue
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Promoter polymorphism of the erythropoietin gene in severe diabetic eye and kidney complications.

Authors:  Zongzhong Tong; Zhenglin Yang; Shrena Patel; Haoyu Chen; Daniel Gibbs; Xian Yang; Vincent S Hau; Yuuki Kaminoh; Jennifer Harmon; Erik Pearson; Jeanette Buehler; Yuhong Chen; Baifeng Yu; Nicholas H Tinkham; Norman A Zabriskie; Jiexi Zeng; Ling Luo; Jennifer K Sun; Manvi Prakash; Rola N Hamam; Stephen Tonna; Ryan Constantine; Cecinio C Ronquillo; SriniVas Sadda; Robert L Avery; John M Brand; Nyall London; Alfred L Anduze; George L King; Paul S Bernstein; Scott Watkins; Lynn B Jorde; Dean Y Li; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Martin R Pollak; Kang Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Harnessing Population Pedigree Data and Machine Learning Methods to Identify Patterns of Familial Bladder Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Heidi A Hanson; Claire L Leiser; Brock O'Neil; Christopher Martin; Sumati Gupta; Ken R Smith; Christopher Dechet; William T Lowrance; Michael J Madsen; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Family Study Designs Informed by Tumor Heterogeneity and Multi-Cancer Pleiotropies: The Power of the Utah Population Database.

Authors:  Heidi A Hanson; Claire L Leiser; Michael J Madsen; John Gardner; Stacey Knight; Melissa Cessna; Carol Sweeney; Jennifer A Doherty; Ken R Smith; Philip S Bernard; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Origins and affinities of modern humans: a comparison of mitochondrial and nuclear genetic data.

Authors:  L B Jorde; M J Bamshad; W S Watkins; R Zenger; A E Fraley; P A Krakowiak; K D Carpenter; H Soodyall; T Jenkins; A R Rogers
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Population substructure in Cache County, Utah: the Cache County study.

Authors:  Aaron R Sharp; Perry G Ridge; Matthew H Bailey; Kevin L Boehme; Maria C Norton; JoAnn T Tschanz; Ronald G Munger; Christopher D Corcoran; John S K Kauwe
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Mitochondrial genomic analysis of late onset Alzheimer's disease reveals protective haplogroups H6A1A/H6A1B: the Cache County Study on Memory in Aging.

Authors:  Perry G Ridge; Taylor J Maxwell; Christopher D Corcoran; Maria C Norton; Joann T Tschanz; Elizabeth O'Brien; Richard A Kerber; Richard M Cawthon; Ronald G Munger; John S K Kauwe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.