Literature DB >> 32098891

Family Study Designs Informed by Tumor Heterogeneity and Multi-Cancer Pleiotropies: The Power of the Utah Population Database.

Heidi A Hanson1,2,3, Claire L Leiser4,5, Michael J Madsen4, John Gardner4, Stacey Knight6, Melissa Cessna7,8, Carol Sweeney4,9,10, Jennifer A Doherty4,9,11, Ken R Smith4,2,12, Philip S Bernard4,13, Nicola J Camp4,2,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previously, family-based designs and high-risk pedigrees have illustrated value for the discovery of high- and intermediate-risk germline breast cancer susceptibility genes. However, genetic heterogeneity is a major obstacle hindering progress. New strategies and analytic approaches will be necessary to make further advances. One opportunity with the potential to address heterogeneity via improved characterization of disease is the growing availability of multisource databases. Specific to advances involving family-based designs are resources that include family structure, such as the Utah Population Database (UPDB). To illustrate the broad utility and potential power of multisource databases, we describe two different novel family-based approaches to reduce heterogeneity in the UPDB.
METHODS: Our first approach focuses on using pedigree-informed breast tumor phenotypes in gene mapping. Our second approach focuses on the identification of families with similar pleiotropies. We use a novel network-inspired clustering technique to explore multi-cancer signatures for high-risk breast cancer families.
RESULTS: Our first approach identifies a genome-wide significant breast cancer locus at 2q13 [P = 1.6 × 10-8, logarithm of the odds (LOD) equivalent 6.64]. In the region, IL1A and IL1B are of particular interest, key cytokine genes involved in inflammation. Our second approach identifies five multi-cancer risk patterns. These clusters include expected coaggregations (such as breast cancer with prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, and melanoma), and also identify novel patterns, including coaggregation with uterine, thyroid, and bladder cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest pedigree-informed tumor phenotypes can map genes for breast cancer, and that various different cancer pleiotropies exist for high-risk breast cancer pedigrees. IMPACT: Both methods illustrate the potential for decreasing etiologic heterogeneity that large, population-based multisource databases can provide.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Modernizing Population Science." ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32098891      PMCID: PMC7168701          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  63 in total

1.  STRIDE--An integrated standards-based translational research informatics platform.

Authors:  Henry J Lowe; Todd A Ferris; Penni M Hernandez; Susan C Weber
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

2.  Accuracy and computational efficiency of a graphical modeling approach to linkage disequilibrium estimation.

Authors:  Haley J Abel; Alun Thomas
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011-01-06

3.  Cancer in first-degree relatives and risk of testicular cancer in Denmark.

Authors:  Rikke Baastrup Nordsborg; Jaymie R Meliker; Jan Wohlfahrt; Mads Melbye; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results.

Authors:  E Lander; L Kruglyak
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13.

Authors:  R Wooster; S L Neuhausen; J Mangion; Y Quirk; D Ford; N Collins; K Nguyen; S Seal; T Tran; D Averill
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Interleukin 1 beta (IL1B) promoter polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 47 published studies.

Authors:  Bangshun He; Ying Zhang; Yuqin Pan; Yeqiong Xu; Ling Gu; Liping Chen; Shukui Wang
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  A 50-gene intrinsic subtype classifier for prognosis and prediction of benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen.

Authors:  Stephen K Chia; Vivien H Bramwell; Dongsheng Tu; Lois E Shepherd; Shan Jiang; Tammi Vickery; Elaine Mardis; Samuel Leung; Karen Ung; Kathleen I Pritchard; Joel S Parker; Philip S Bernard; Charles M Perou; Matthew J Ellis; Torsten O Nielsen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Chromosome 17q linkage studies of 18 Utah breast cancer kindreds.

Authors:  D E Goldgar; L A Cannon-Albright; A Oliphant; J H Ward; G Linker; J Swensen; T D Tran; P Fields; P Uharriet; M H Skolnick
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Shared genomic segment analysis: the power to find rare disease variants.

Authors:  Stacey Knight; Ryan P Abo; Haley J Abel; Deborah W Neklason; Therese M Tuohy; Randall W Burt; Alun Thomas; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  4 in total

1.  Geographic Proximity of Family Members and Healthcare Utilization After Complex Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Brian T Bucher; Meng Yang; Rebecca Richards Steed; Alison Fraser; Samuel R G Finlayson; Heidi A Hanson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 13.787

2.  Charting the life course: Emerging opportunities to advance scientific approaches using life course research.

Authors:  Heidi A Hanson; Claire L Leiser; Gretchen Bandoli; Brad H Pollock; Margaret R Karagas; Daniel Armstrong; Ann Dozier; Nicole G Weiskopf; Maureen Monaghan; Ann M Davis; Elizabeth Eckstrom; Chunhua Weng; Jonathan N Tobin; Frederick Kaskel; Mark R Schleiss; Peter Szilagyi; Carrie Dykes; Dan Cooper; Shari L Barkin
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-06-15

3.  Duo Shared Genomic Segment analysis identifies a genome-wide significant risk locus at 18q21.33 in myeloma pedigrees.

Authors:  Rosalie Griffin Waller; Michael J Madsen; John Gardner; Douglas W Sborov; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  J Transl Genet Genom       Date:  2021-05-27

4.  Shared genomic segment analysis in a large high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia pedigree implicates CXCR4 in inherited risk.

Authors:  Julie E Feusier; Michael J Madsen; Brian J Avery; Justin A Williams; Deborah M Stephens; Boyu Hu; Afaf E G Osman; Martha J Glenn; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  J Transl Genet Genom       Date:  2021-06-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.