Literature DB >> 7997460

Manifestations of sexual selection may depend on the genetic bases of sex determination.

I M Hastings1.   

Abstract

A variant of the 'handicap' model of sexual selection is described which predicts that the evolution of ornate male traits occurs more easily in species where females are the heterogametic sex. The process occurs even when the alleles conferring high paternal 'fitness' remain advantageous for only a short time due to a rapidly changing physical or biotic environment: the timescale of this advantage may approach the gestation time of the organism. This provides an explanation as to why sexual selection in species where females are heterogametic (such as birds) occurs mainly by the elaboration of ornate male secondary sexual characteristics, whereas in species where females are homogametic (such as mammals) sexual selection results predominantly in inter-male rivalry and the evolution of traits such as horns, antlers and large body size. An analogy between the evolution of elaborate male traits and the evolution of warning coloration is noted.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7997460     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system.

Authors:  M G Ritchie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic biases for showy males: are some genetic systems especially conducive to sexual selection?

Authors:  Hudson Kern Reeve; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sex chromosomes and male ornaments: a comparative evaluation in ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; David W Hall; Mark Kirkpatrick; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; James D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genomic evidence for a large-Z effect.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Female heterogamety and speciation: reduced introgression of the Z chromosome between two species of nightingales.

Authors:  Radka Storchová; Jirí Reif; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Fast-X on the Z: rapid evolution of sex-linked genes in birds.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Erik Axelsson; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Meta-analytic evidence that sexual selection improves population fitness.

Authors:  Justin G Cally; Devi Stuart-Fox; Luke Holman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Extraordinary sex ratios: cultural effects on ecological consequences.

Authors:  Ferenc Molnár; Thomas Caraco; Gyorgy Korniss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.