Literature DB >> 12540829

Genetic biases for showy males: are some genetic systems especially conducive to sexual selection?

Hudson Kern Reeve1, David W Pfennig.   

Abstract

Male secondary sexual characters (conspicuous ornaments, signals, colors) are among nature's most striking features. Yet, it is unclear why certain groups of organisms are more likely than others to evolve these traits. One explanation for such taxonomic biases is that some genetic systems may be especially conducive to sexual selection. Here, we present theory and simulation results demonstrating that rare alleles encoding either male ornaments or female preferences for those ornaments are better protected against random loss in species with ZZZW or ZZZO sex chromosome systems (male homogamety) than in species with XXXY or XXXO systems (male heterogamety). Moreover, this protection is much stronger in diploid than haplodiploid species. We also present empirical data showing that male secondary sexual characters are better developed in diploid than haplodiploid species and in diploid species with male homogamety than in those with male heterogamety. Thus, taxonomic biases for showy males may stem from differences in sex chromosome systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12540829      PMCID: PMC298731          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0337427100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  The ZW pairs of two paleognath birds from two orders show transitional stages of sex chromosome differentiation.

Authors:  M I Pigozzi; A J Solari
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation.

Authors:  H A Orr; A J Betancourt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Dosage compensation: do birds do it as well?

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Environmental sex determination in reptiles: ecology, evolution, and experimental design.

Authors:  F J Janzen; G L Paukstis
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.875

7.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE "HANDICAP" PRINCIPLE.

Authors:  Yoh Iwasa; Andrew Pomiankowski; Sean Nee
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  PERSPECTIVE: INDIRECT MATE CHOICE, COMPETITION FOR MATES, AND COEVOLUTION OF THE SEXES.

Authors:  R Haven Wiley; Joe Poston
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION.

Authors:  Andrew Pomiankowski; Yoh Iwasa; Sean Nee
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  38 in total

1.  The long and the short of avian W chromosomes: no evidence for gradual W shortening.

Authors:  Joanna Rutkowska; Malgorzata Lagisz; Shinichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Speciation genetics: current status and evolving approaches.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Johan Lindell; Niclas Backström
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Levels of linkage disequilibrium in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Niclas Backström; Anna Qvarnström; Lars Gustafsson; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Nonrandom representation of sex-biased genes on chicken Z chromosome.

Authors:  R Storchová; P Divina
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Sex chromosomes and male ornaments: a comparative evaluation in ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; David W Hall; Mark Kirkpatrick; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; James D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Haldane's rule in the 21st century.

Authors:  M Schilthuizen; M C W G Giesbers; L W Beukeboom
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Genomic evidence for a large-Z effect.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Concerted evolution of male and female display traits in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Lassance; Christer Löfstedt
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 10.  Progress and prospects toward our understanding of the evolution of dosage compensation.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.