Literature DB >> 7996289

A decision aid for referring patients with systolic murmurs for echocardiography.

J C Fink1, C H Schmid, H P Selker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the practice pattern of a group of primary care providers in ordering echocardiography for healthy patients and to derive a decision aid to identify patients with systolic murmurs who have significant cardiac lesions.
DESIGN: Retrospective case review of clinical variables, including the demographic, historical, and physical examination features obtained from chart review of the physician evaluation prior to referral for echocardiography and the echocardiographic results, with both univariate and multivariate regression analyses used to identify variables predictive of positive echocardiographic outcomes and to derive a regression model.
SETTING: General internal medicine clinic in an urban major teaching hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 169 patients between the ages of 18 and 55 years selected retrospectively from medical records.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Symptoms and auscultatory findings were not predictive of positive echocardiographic outcomes among the patients referred for the test. For the patients who had systolic murmurs, a logistic regression model had three significant predictors of positive echocardiographic results: additional year of age (odds ratio: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13; p = 0.007); male gender (odds ratio: 5.87, 95% CI: 1.99-17.3; p = 0.002); and murmur grade > or = 3 (odds ratio: 4.99, 95% CI: 1.27-19.6; p = 0.02). The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve area for this model was 0.741. If women aged 35 years and less with murmur grades < or = 2 had not been referred, 47% of the echocardiographies could have been avoided while retaining a sensitivity of 90%.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggested that healthy patients with systolic murmurs are least likely to have positive echocardiographic results when they are young and female and have murmur grades < or = 2. More careful screening of this group might make unnecessary almost half of the echocardiographies yielding negative results ordered for healthy patients with systolic murmurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7996289     DOI: 10.1007/BF02599215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  17 in total

1.  Mitral valve prolapse: comparison of diagnosis by physical examination and echocardiography.

Authors:  K E Olive; E D Grassman
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 0.954

2.  The normal systolic murmur.

Authors:  D GROOM; W CHAPMAN; W W FRANCIS; A BASS; Y T SIHVONEN
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Mitral valve prolapse: is echocardiography yielding too little or too much to the practicing physician?

Authors:  H C Coghlan
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Electrocardiograms and decision aids in coronary care triage: the truth, but not the whole truth.

Authors:  H P Selker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Contribuiton of M-mode echocardiography to cardiac diagnosis. An assessment in 1,000 successive patients.

Authors:  W Markiewicz; B Peled; H Hammerman; Z Greif; J Hir; E Riss
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Utility of echocardiography in patients with suspected mitral valve prolapse.

Authors:  W Y Hershman; M A Moskowitz; K I Marton; G J Balady
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Detection of mild aortic regurgitation by range-gated pulsed Doppler echocardiograhy.

Authors:  R J Esper
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Nonspecific systolic murmurs: an audit of the clinical value of echocardiography.

Authors:  M Xu; D J McHaffie
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1993-02-24

9.  Should all patients with atrial fibrillation be screened with echocardiography?

Authors:  N A Desbiens
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Causes of false-negative auscultation of regurgitant lesions: a Doppler echocardiographic study of 294 patients.

Authors:  E L Kinney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiography or auscultation? How to evaluate systolic murmurs.

Authors:  Clarence Shub
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  A systematic review of trends and patterns of congenital heart disease in children in Nigeria from 1964-2015.

Authors:  Mohammed Abdulkadir; Zainab Abdulkadir
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 3.  Clinical examination: still a tool for our times?

Authors:  Jack Ende; Kevin M Fosnocht
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2002

4.  Utility of physical examination and comparison to echocardiography for cardiac diagnosis.

Authors:  Ashish Patel; Nitin Singh Tomar; Anil Bharani
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-08-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.