Literature DB >> 7137029

Detection of mild aortic regurgitation by range-gated pulsed Doppler echocardiograhy.

R J Esper.   

Abstract

In order to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the range-gated pulsed Doppler echocardiogram for the detection of aortic regurgitation, a study with use of this technique was carried out in 46 patients. They were classified into 3 groups: Group I was composed of 19 patients with a variety of heart diseases but with a competent aortic valve. Cardiac catheterization revealed no aortic regurgitation in any of the 19 patients, and the Doppler echocardiogram detected no turbulent diastolic flow in the left ventricular outflow tract. Group II was composed of 17 patients who clinically and by auscultation had aortic regurgitation, which was confirmed by cardiac catheterization in 6. In all 17 patients the Doppler echocardiogram detected several grades of turbulent diastolic flow compatible with aortic regurgitation in the left ventricular outflow tract. Group III was composed of 10 patients with aortic regurgitation but without the expected clinical or auscultatory evidence. The echocardiogram detected mitral valve flutter in only 1 patient. Cardiac catheterization revealed aortic regurgitation graded 1/4 and 2/4 in 9 patients, and the patient who did not undergo catheterization had a murmur of aortic insufficiency 6 months later. In all 10 patients the Doppler echocardiogram detected a regurgitating turbulent flow compatible with aortic regurgitation in the left ventricular outflow tract. It is concluded that the Doppler echocardiogram was more useful than auscultation and echocardiography for the detection of mild aortic regurgitation. In this study the range-gated pulsed Doppler echocardiogram proved 100% sensitive and specific. However, it will be necessary to study larger groups in order to assess its utility in more complicated conditions (obesity, emphysema, and heart failure) and the differential diagnosis with other diastolic murmurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7137029     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90414-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of cardiac hemodynamics and valvular function by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  D C Wallerson; J Dubin; R B Devereux
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1987-10

2.  Doppler echocardiography after anatomical correction of transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  J L Gibbs; S A Qureshi; L Grieve; C Webb; R R Smith; M H Yacoub
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-07

3.  A decision aid for referring patients with systolic murmurs for echocardiography.

Authors:  J C Fink; C H Schmid; H P Selker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Comparison of echocardiography and angiography in determining the cause of severe aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  N L DePace; P F Nestico; M N Kotler; G S Mintz; D Kimbiris; I P Goel; E E Glazier-Laskey; J Ross
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1984-01

5.  A comparison of the assessment of mitral valve area by continuous wave Doppler and by cross sectional echocardiography.

Authors:  F Loperfido; F Laurenzi; F Gimigliano; F Pennestri; L M Biasucci; C Vigna; F De Santis; A Favuzzi; E Rossi; U Manzoli
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-04

6.  Causes of false-negative auscultation of regurgitant lesions: a Doppler echocardiographic study of 294 patients.

Authors:  E L Kinney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.