Literature DB >> 7994975

Tibial osteolysis in cementless total knee arthroplasty. A review of 25 cases treated with and without tibial component revision.

G A Engh1, N L Parks, D J Ammeen.   

Abstract

Revision total knee arthroplasty was performed in 25 knees with tibial osteolysis that was identified radiographically and confirmed histologically. Eighteen knees had focal osteolysis in the medial tibial plateau, 2 in the lateral plateau, and 5 in both plateaus. Three surgical treatment options were used: (1) exchange of the modular tibial polyethylene insert with screw removal; (2) revision of the tibial component with curettage and optional grafting of the defect; (3) and full revision of all components. The clinical and radiographic results of partial and full revision remain excellent 2 to 6 years (mean, 41 months) postrevision arthroplasty for 23 knees. Clinical failure with pending revision occurred in 1 patient with polyethylene exchange without the removal of tibial fixation screws, and in 1 patient with progression of osteolysis adjacent to the femoral component 2 years after tibial component revision. Tibial defects have not progressed, and new lesions have not developed with simple curettage of the defect and removal of sources of particulate. Tibial baseplates remain radiographically stable. Component revision of the tibial component, femoral component, or both, required the insertion of long-stemmed revision components and frequently the use of major structural allografts. These revisions have faired well, although the long-term stability of components supported with major structural allografts is unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7994975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: 13-year survivorship of AGC total knee systems with average 7 years followup.

Authors:  Philip M Faris; E Michael Keating; Alex Farris; John B Meding; Merrill A Ritter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty for major osteolysis.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

3.  Is There A Difference in Bone Ingrowth in Modular Versus Monoblock Porous Tantalum Tibial Trays?

Authors:  Josa A Hanzlik; Judd S Day; Clare M Rimnac; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Polyethylene quality affects revision knee liner exchange survivorship.

Authors:  C Anderson Engh; Nancy L Parks; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Backside wear in modern total knee designs.

Authors:  Prakash Jayabalan; Bridgette D Furman; Jocelyn M Cottrell; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-02

6.  Treatment for Wear and Osteolysis in Well-Fixed Uncemented TKR.

Authors:  Leah Nunez; Brandon Broome; Tom Pace; Melinda Harman
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2013-02-11

7.  A rare case of bilateral large osteolysis following cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Julian Dexel; Stephan Kirschner; Melinda K Harman; Jörg Lützner
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.