Literature DB >> 7993860

Complications after laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy: a comparative study.

I B Brune1, K Schönleben, S Omran.   

Abstract

The growing popularity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has made extensive series comparing laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy in a prospective, randomized way nearly impossible. To evaluate LC we compared retrospectively 800 laparoscopic with 748 conventional cholecystectomies (CC). Of the 800 LC, 10 (1.2%) were converted to laparotomy. 6 conversions were related to aberrant anatomical features or features making dissection very difficult, 4 conversions were due to complications. There were 5 (0.6%) intraoperative complications during LC and 4 (0.5%) during CC. Postoperative morbidity was 2.1% (n = 17) after LC and 3.7% (n = 28) after CC. Particularly the incidence of wound problems was only 0.5% (n = 4) after LC while it was 1.3% (n = 10) after CC. Overall morbidity was 2.7% (n = 22) for LC and 4.2% (n = 32) for CC. Mortality rate after CC was 0.4% (n = 3), there were no deaths after LC. Common bile duct-injury rate was 0.2% (n = 2) for both groups. Complication rates after LC have been rapidly decreasing with growing experience. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can safely be performed by appropriately trained surgeons in more than 90% of patients suffering from gallbladder disease. The low morbidity and mortality together with the significant advantages to patient recovery makes laparoscopic cholecystectomy the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7993860      PMCID: PMC2423752          DOI: 10.1155/1994/59865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB Surg        ISSN: 0894-8569


  7 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment.

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; W Wayand
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Overcoming the difficulties in laparoscopic management of contracted gallbladders with gallstones: possible role of fundus-down approach.

Authors:  Shing-Moo Huang; Kuang-Ming Hsiao; Huichin Pan; Chung-Chin Yao; Te-Jen Lai; Ling-Yun Chen; Chew-Wun Wu; Wing-Yiu Lui
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: A safe and effective alternative surgical technique in "difficult cholecystectomies".

Authors:  Fatih Kulen; Deniz Tihan; Uğur Duman; Emrah Bayam; Gökhan Zaim
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-04-06

4.  The effect of surgical strategy in difficult cholecystectomy cases on postoperative complications outcome: a value-based healthcare comparative study.

Authors:  K Cremer; F W H Kloppenberg; J W Vanhommerig; L M Dijksman; N Bode; S C Donkervoort
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Ontario: does ICD-9 coding indicate true incidence?

Authors:  B Taylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-24       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Predicting major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a simple risk score.

Authors:  Melissa M Murphy; Shimul A Shah; Jessica P Simons; Nicholas G Csikesz; Theodore P McDade; Andreea Bodnari; Sing-Chau Ng; Zheng Zhou; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Surgeon's volume is not associated with complication outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sandra C Donkervoort; Lea M Dijksman; Pieter G Versluis; Emile A Clous; Anco C Vahl
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.