Literature DB >> 7991347

Familiarity and pop-out in visual search.

Q Wang1, P Cavanagh, M Green.   

Abstract

In this paper, we report that when the low-level features of targets and distractors are held constant, visual search performance can be strongly influenced by familiarity. In the first condition, a [symbol: see text] was the target amid [symbol: see text]s as distractors, and vice versa. The response time increased steeply as a function of number of distractors (82 msec/item). When the same stimuli were rotated by 90 degrees (the second condition), however, they became familiar patterns--2 and 5--and gave rise to much shallower search functions (31 msec/item). In the third condition, when the search was for a familiar target, N (or Z), among unfamiliar distractors, [symbol: see text]s (or [symbol: see text]s), the slope was about 46 msec/item. In the last condition, when the search was for an unfamiliar target, [symbol: see text] (or [symbol: see text]), among familiar distractors, Ns (or Zs), parallel search functions were found with a slope of about 1.5 msec/item. These results show that familiarity speeds visual search and that it does so principally when the distractors, not the targets, are familiar.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7991347     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

1.  Surfaces versus features in visual search.

Authors:  Z J He; K Nakayama
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  E K Miller; L Li; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.

Authors:  A Treisman; J Souther
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1985-09

8.  Interactions between items in visual search.

Authors:  I E Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-03

9.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions.

Authors:  K Nakayama; G H Silverman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Mar 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Classification without identification in visual search.

Authors:  J Brand
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  62 in total

1.  Negative priming and stimulus familiarity: what causes opposite results?

Authors:  Jun-Ichi Nagai; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

2.  Facilitation of visual target detection by pre-perceptual processing of negative emotion driven by simple geometric shapes.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takeshima; Jiro Gyoba
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Enhancing visual working memory encoding: The role of target novelty.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Jejoong Kim; Sohee Park
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Neural networks and perceptual learning.

Authors:  Misha Tsodyks; Charles Gilbert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Does the compatibility effect in the race Implicit Association Test reflect familiarity or affect?

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Marie Peek-O'Leary
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

6.  Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli.

Authors:  Hing Yee Eng; Diyu Chen; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

7.  Asymmetries in categorization, perceptual discrimination, and visual search for reference and nonreference exemplars.

Authors:  Olivier Corneille; Robert L Goldstone; Sarah Queller; Timothy Potter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

8.  Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-14

9.  Object-finding skill created by repeated reward experience.

Authors:  Ali Ghazizadeh; Whitney Griggs; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Adult visual cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Charles D Gilbert; Wu Li
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.