Literature DB >> 7991256

Outcomes research and otolaryngology.

J F Piccirillo1.   

Abstract

Outcomes research studies the effects of diverse therapies on patient outcome and is increasingly recognized by physicians, third-party payers, and the federal government as crucial for the demonstration of treatment effectiveness and the establishment of patient treatment guidelines. Outcomes research began in the 1970s when researchers studied the geographic variation in the rates and appropriateness of various surgical procedures, including tonsillectomies. Outcomes research is different from traditional clinical research because it addresses a wide variety of issues pertaining to health care delivery, strategy, and policy. To address these issues, outcomes research uses two principal methodologic approaches: (1) nonrandomized research methods and (2) expanded descriptions of patient outcomes. The methodologic requirements for outcomes research include (1) establishment of the diagnostic criteria for the disease under study, (2) creation of clinical-severity index for prognostic stratification, (3) identification and measurement of cogent comorbid conditions, and (4) establishment of outcomes that include descriptions of health status, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and medical costs. Many diseases within otolaryngology seem appropriate for outcomes research. Because prospective outcomes research is conducted with patients treated in the community, great opportunity exists for community-based physicians to become involved in this type of research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7991256     DOI: 10.1177/019459989411100611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

1.  Tinnitus outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Mary B Meikle; Barbara J Stewart; Susan E Griest; James A Henry
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-07-03

2.  Patient-centered decision making: the role of the baseline SNOT-22 in predicting outcomes for medical management of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Toby O Steele; Luke Rudmik; Jess C Mace; Adam S DeConde; Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.858

Review 3.  Rhinosinusitis: Establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care.

Authors:  Eli O Meltzer; Daniel L Hamilos; James A Hadley; Donald C Lanza; Bradley F Marple; Richard A Nicklas; Claus Bachert; James Baraniuk; Fuad M Baroody; Michael S Benninger; Itzhak Brook; Badrul A Chowdhury; Howard M Druce; Stephen Durham; Berrylin Ferguson; Jack M Gwaltney; Michael Kaliner; David W Kennedy; Valerie Lund; Robert Naclerio; Ruby Pawankar; Jay F Piccirillo; Patricia Rohane; Ronald Simon; Raymond G Slavin; Alkis Togias; Ellen R Wald; S James Zinreich
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 4.  Rhinosinusitis: establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care.

Authors:  Eli O Meltzer; Daniel L Hamilos; James A Hadley; Donald C Lanza; Bradley F Marple; Richard A Nicklas; Claus Bachert; James Baraniuk; Fuad M Baroody; Michael S Benninger; Itzhak Brook; Badrul A Chowdhury; Howard M Druce; Stephen Durham; Berrylin Ferguson; Jack M Gwaltney; Michael Kaliner; David W Kennedy; Valerie Lund; Robert Naclerio; Ruby Pawankar; Jay F Piccirillo; Patricia Rohane; Ronald Simon; Raymond G Slavin; Alkis Togias; Ellen R Wald; S James Zinreich
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Quality of life in Taiwanese adults with chronic rhino-sinusitis.

Authors:  Pa-Chun Wang; Chih-Jaan Tai; Min-Shung Lin; Chia-Chen Chu; Shu-Cheng Liang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.