Literature DB >> 26852743

Patient-centered decision making: the role of the baseline SNOT-22 in predicting outcomes for medical management of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Toby O Steele1, Luke Rudmik2, Jess C Mace3, Adam S DeConde4, Jeremiah A Alt5, Timothy L Smith3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), the decision to elect continued medical management vs surgery is complex and involves tradeoffs between benefits, risks, and overall effectiveness of each therapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether baseline disease-specific quality of life (QOL) can assist in predicting outcomes in patients with refractory CRS who elect continued medical management.
METHODS: CRS patients electing medical management were enrolled in a prospective, multi-institutional cohort study. Patients were stratified into pretreatment 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) subgroups based on 10-point score increments (eg, 10 to 19, 20 to 29, 30 to 39, etc.) to capture potential outcome differences by baseline SNOT-22 disease burden. The proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID≥9 points) and relative improvement (%) for each score category were calculated.
RESULTS: Seventy-five CRS patients with a mean ± standard deviation pretreatment SNOT-22 score of 45.2 ± 16.6 were followed for a mean of 14.9 months. The majority of participants electing medical therapy failed to improve 1 MCID (57%) with a mean relative score improvement of 16%. Overall, 37% of patients maintained baseline SNOT-22 QOL status, whereas 20% of patients deteriorated >1 MCID. When treatment crossover patients (to endoscopic sinus surgery [ESS]) were included (n = 117), approximately 1 in 4 (27%) patients achieved an MCID.
CONCLUSION: Results from this study suggest that the majority of CRS patients electing ongoing medical management with low baseline disease-specific QOL impairment maintain stable QOL with continued medical management. Furthermore, of CRS patients electing ongoing medical therapy, approximately 1 in 4 patients achieved MCID, whereas 1 in 5 experienced deterioration by >1 MCID.
© 2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  case-control studies; medical therapy management; outcome assessment; patient outcome assessment; sinusitis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26852743      PMCID: PMC4921291          DOI: 10.1002/alr.21721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  19 in total

1.  The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda.

Authors:  Joe V Selby; Anne C Beal; Lori Frank
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Efficacy of targeted medical therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis, and predictors of failure.

Authors:  Devyani Lal; Joseph M Scianna; James A Stankiewicz
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.467

Review 3.  Quality of life outcomes after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Zachary M Soler; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Productivity costs in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Timothy L Smith; Rodney J Schlosser; Peter H Hwang; Jess C Mace; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The predictive value of the preoperative Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 score in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Claire Hopkins; Luke Rudmik; Valerie J Lund
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Patient-centered decision making in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Zachary M Soler; Luke Rudmik; Peter H Hwang; Jess C Mace; Rodney J Schlosser; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis.

Authors:  Richard M Rosenfeld; David Andes; Neil Bhattacharyya; Dickson Cheung; Steven Eisenberg; Theodore G Ganiats; Andrea Gelzer; Daniel Hamilos; Richard C Haydon; Patricia A Hudgins; Stacie Jones; Helene J Krouse; Lawrence H Lee; Martin C Mahoney; Bradley F Marple; Col John P Mitchell; Robert Nathan; Richard N Shiffman; Timothy L Smith; David L Witsell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Endoscopic sinus surgery compared to continued medical therapy for patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Kristine A Smith; Timothy L Smith; Jess C Mace; Luke Rudmik
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.858

9.  Impact of continued medical therapy in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Kristine A Smith; Luke Rudmik
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.858

10.  Sleep and quality of life improvements after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith; Rodney J Schlosser; Jess C Mace; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.858

View more
  7 in total

1.  Analysis of factors associated with electing endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Adam S DeConde; Jess C Mace; Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Defining the minimal clinically important difference for olfactory outcomes in the surgical treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Joshua M Levy; Jess C Mace; Todd E Bodner; Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.858

3.  Influence of interpersonal traits on patient outcomes in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Joshua M Levy; Jess C Mace; Timothy L Smith; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.858

4.  Low 22-item sinonasal outcome test scores in chronic rhinosinusitis: Why do patients seek treatment?

Authors:  Joshua M Levy; Jess C Mace; Luke Rudmik; Zachary M Soler; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Assessment of Quality of Life and the Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Individuals with Chronic Rhinosinusitis who are Candidate for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Jahangir Ghorbani; Shahabeddin Goudarzi; Parisa Adimi Naghan; Afshin Nikravesh; Somayeh Akhavan; Alireza Afshar; Payam Abbasi
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2021-01

6.  Prognostic value of the Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Stefania Gallo; Federico Russo; Francesco Mozzanica; Andrea Preti; Francesco Bandi; Cecilia Costantino; Roberto Gera; Francesco Ottaviani; Paolo Castelnuovo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Use of the long-term quality of life assessment in the decision to indicate surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Pablo Pinillos Marambaia; Manuela Garcia Lima; Hélder Macário; Amaury de Machado Gomes; Leonado Marques Gomes; Melina Pinillos Marambaia; Otávio Marambaia Dos Santos
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.