Literature DB >> 18599500

Tinnitus outcomes assessment.

Mary B Meikle1, Barbara J Stewart, Susan E Griest, James A Henry.   

Abstract

Over the past two decades, recognition has grown that measures for evaluating treatment outcomes must be designed specifically to have high responsiveness. With that in mind, four major types of tinnitus measures are reviewed, including psychoacoustic measures, self-report questionnaires concerning functional effects of tinnitus, various rating scales, and global outcome measures. Nine commonly used tinnitus questionnaires, developed in the period 1980-2000, are reviewed. Because of many similarities between tinnitus and pain, comparisons between pain and tinnitus measures are discussed, and recommendations that have been made for developing a core set of measures to evaluate treatment-related changes in pain are presented as providing a fruitful path for developing a core set of measures for tinnitus. Finally, the importance of having both immediately obtainable outcome measures (psychoacoustic, rating scales, or single global measures) and longer term measures (questionnaires covering the negative effects of tinnitus) is emphasized for further work in tinnitus outcomes assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18599500      PMCID: PMC4134890          DOI: 10.1177/1084713808319943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  30 in total

1.  Tinnitus severity measured by a subjective scale, audiometry and clinical judgement.

Authors:  J B Halford; S D Anderson
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults.

Authors:  Rachel McArdle; Theresa H Chisolm; Harvey B Abrams; Richard H Wilson; Patrick J Doyle
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

3.  The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap questionnaire.

Authors:  F K Kuk; R S Tyler; D Russell; H Jordan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Outcome Questionnaire: item sensitivity to change.

Authors:  D A Vermeersch; M J Lambert; G M Burlingame
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2000-04

5.  A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; M Townsend; L B Berman; J L Keller
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  A methodological framework for assessing health indices.

Authors:  B Kirshner; G Guyatt
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

7.  Nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: Part Two.

Authors:  B J Stewart; P G Archbold
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 8.  Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Robert R Allen; Nicholas Bellamy; Nancy Brandenburg; Daniel B Carr; Charles Cleeland; Raymond Dionne; John T Farrar; Bradley S Galer; David J Hewitt; Alejandro R Jadad; Nathaniel P Katz; Lynn D Kramer; Donald C Manning; Cynthia G McCormick; Michael P McDermott; Patrick McGrath; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; James P Robinson; Mike A Royal; Lee Simon; Joseph W Stauffer; Wendy Stein; Jane Tollett; James Witter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Neurophysiological model of tinnitus: dependence of the minimal masking level on treatment outcome.

Authors:  P J Jastreboff; J W Hazell; R L Graham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis Revicki; Gale Harding; Laurie B Burke; David Cella; Charles S Cleeland; Penney Cowan; John T Farrar; Sharon Hertz; Mitchell B Max; Bob A Rappaport
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  29 in total

1.  Changes over time of psychoacoustic outcome measurements are not a substitute for subjective outcome measurements in acute tinnitus.

Authors:  Sarah Rabau; Tony Cox; Andrea Kleine Punte; Brecht Waelkens; Annick Gilles; Kristien Wouters; Sebastien Janssens de Varebeke; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The evaluation of ozone and betahistine in the treatment of tinnitus.

Authors:  Onur Sönmez; Ismail Külahlı; Alperen Vural; Mehmet Ilhan Sahin; Mesut Aydın
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Content validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management.

Authors:  Hye Yoon Seol; Ga-Young Kim; Mini Jo; Soojin Kang; Young Sang Cho; Sung Hwa Hong; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Management of tinnitus in English NHS audiology departments: an evaluation of current practice.

Authors:  Derek J Hoare; Phillip E Gander; Luke Collins; Sandra Smith; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Effects of frequency discrimination training on tinnitus: results from two randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Derek J Hoare; Victoria L Kowalkowski; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-04

6.  Tinnitus: distinguishing between subjectively perceived loudness and tinnitus-related distress.

Authors:  Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke; Joachim Brade; Tobias Balkenhol; Roberto D'Amelio; Andrea Seegmüller; Wolfgang Delb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Tinnitus Severity Short Form.

Authors:  Madelyn R Frumkin; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Eldre W Beukes; Vinaya Manchaiah; Gerhard Andersson; Thomas L Rodebaugh
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.636

8.  Prevalence of tinnitus in workers exposed to noise and organophosphates.

Authors:  Camila Ribas Delecrode; Thais Domingues de Freitas; Ana Claúdia Figueiredo Frizzo; Ana Claúdia Vieira Cardoso
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07

9.  Validation of the mandarin tinnitus evaluation questionnaire: A clinician-administered tool for tinnitus management.

Authors:  Zhiji Chen; Yun Zheng; Yingping Fei; Di Wu; Xiameng Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Fluctuations in Subjective Tinnitus Ratings Over Time: Implications for Clinical Research.

Authors:  Jenny X Chen; Jonathon P Whitton; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.