Literature DB >> 7991127

The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue, and finger.

R W Van Boven1, K O Johnson.   

Abstract

The sensory neural pathways serving the lip, tongue, and finger are specialized for spatial information processing; thus, damage to these pathways is likely to be manifested most prominently as a loss of spatial acuity. For that reason, accurate measurement of spatial resolution at these regions is particularly important. The conventional test, the two-point discrimination task, does not measure the limit of spatial resolution and it yields variable results because it does not control nonspatial cues. The aim of this study was to quantify the limits of spatial resolution at the lip, tongue, and finger and to study the repeatability of those measurements using a stimulus that does not introduce nonspatial cues. We employed a grating orientation discrimination test, which has been studied extensively in relation to the underlying neural mechanisms. We obtained psychophysical thresholds for tactile spatial resolution from 15 normal, young adult subjects over seven test sessions. The finest gratings whose orientations were discriminated reliably had groove widths (gratings had equal groove and bar widths) that averaged 0.51 mm at the lip, 0.58 mm at the tongue, and 0.94 mm at the finger. These threshold measurements were highly reproducible between sessions with an overall improvement of 2% per session. These data suggest that the grating orientation discrimination task provides a stable, reliable measure of the human capacity for spatial resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7991127     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.44.12.2361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  81 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Touch perception throughout working life: effects of age and expertise.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Reuter; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage; Solveig Vieluf; Ben Godde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Oral hapsis guides accurate hand preshaping for grasping food targets in the mouth.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Behavioural and neurofunctional impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on somatosensory learning.

Authors:  Raphael Hilgenstock; Thomas Weiss; Ralph Huonker; Otto W Witte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex on vibrotactile detection and discrimination.

Authors:  Sara Labbé; El-Mehdi Meftah; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Interoceptive dimensions across cardiac and respiratory axes.

Authors:  Sarah N Garfinkel; Miranda F Manassei; Giles Hamilton-Fletcher; Yvo In den Bosch; Hugo D Critchley; Miriam Engels
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Human touch receptors are sensitive to spatial details on the scale of single fingerprint ridges.

Authors:  Ewa Jarocka; J Andrew Pruszynski; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; James C Craig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Tactile discrimination of grating orientation: fMRI activation patterns.

Authors:  Minming Zhang; Erica Mariola; Randall Stilla; Mark Stoesz; Hui Mao; Xiaoping Hu; K Sathian
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Postural stabilization from fingertip contact II. Relationships between age, tactile sensibility and magnitude of contact forces.

Authors:  François Tremblay; Annie-Claude Mireault; Liam Dessureault; Hélène Manning; Heidi Sveistrup
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.