Literature DB >> 7983463

Comparison-based learning: effects of comparing instances during category learning.

T L Spalding1, B H Ross.   

Abstract

When learning about a category, people often compare new instances with similar old instances and notice features common to the compared instances. Five experiments demonstrate that such comparisons cause features common to compared instances to be considered more important for the category than equally frequent features that are not common to compared instances. Experiment 1 shows that what is learned depends on which instances are compared. Experiment 2 investigates the conditions under which comparison-based learning occurs. The next experiments find that these comparisons affect subjective feature frequency (Experiment 3) and sensitivity to feature correlations (Experiment 4). Experiment 5 shows that comparisons during early learning affect what is learned from later instances. The discussion focuses on the implications for models of category representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7983463     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

1.  What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments.

Authors:  T L Spalding; G L Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

2.  Concept learning and feature interpretation.

Authors:  T L Spalding; B H Ross
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

3.  Learning abstract relations from using categories.

Authors:  Brian H Ross; Justin L Warren
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

4.  Recent exposure affects artifact naming.

Authors:  Steven A Sloman; Marianne C Harrison; Barbara C Malt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

5.  Category learning in the context of co-presented items.

Authors:  Janet K Andrews; Kenneth R Livingston; Kenneth J Kurtz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-11-14

6.  Remindings influence the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Michael Braverman; Brian H Ross; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

7.  Use of evidence in a categorization task: analytic and holistic processing modes.

Authors:  Alberto Greco; Stefania Moretti
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-08-14

8.  How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity.

Authors:  R L Marsh; J D Landau; J L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-09

9.  Encoding effects of remindings.

Authors:  B H Ross; G L Bradshaw
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-09

10.  Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization.

Authors:  Christine D Wilson-Mendenhall; Lisa Feldman Barrett; W Kyle Simmons; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.