Literature DB >> 12219883

Learning abstract relations from using categories.

Brian H Ross1, Justin L Warren.   

Abstract

When people learn categories, the importance of the features and relations in the category representation reflects both their diagnosticity for classification and their relevance to the use of the category. In earlier work in which the influence of category use on the representation has been shown, only cases in which the features and relations were simple, observable, and very specific were examined. Learners may begin to understand the underlying similarities of category members by using the categories. In the four experiments presented here, learners applied a simple category-specific formula to category members. The test results showed that the learners had incorporated relations among features from this use, including cases in which the relations were abstract. This learning occurred even though the relations were actually not predictive of category membership but just perceived to be so as a function of the use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12219883     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual symbol systems.

Authors:  L W Barsalou
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  The effects of category use on learned categories.

Authors:  B H Ross
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

3.  Learning categories composed of varying instances: the effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment.

Authors:  T Yamauchi; A B Markman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

4.  What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments.

Authors:  T L Spalding; G L Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

5.  Concepts do more than categorize.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Abstract coherent categories.

Authors:  B Rehder; B H Ross
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning.

Authors:  G L Murphy; P D Allopenna
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Comparison-based learning: effects of comparing instances during category learning.

Authors:  T L Spalding; B H Ross
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  2 in total

1.  How goals affect the organization and use of domain knowledge.

Authors:  Benjamin D Jee; Jennifer Wiley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

2.  Redescription disembeds relations: evidence from relational transfer and use in problem solving.

Authors:  James A Dixon; Matthew C Dohn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.