Literature DB >> 23835617

Remindings influence the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli.

Jonathan G Tullis1, Michael Braverman, Brian H Ross, Aaron S Benjamin.   

Abstract

Remindings-stimulus-guided retrievals of prior events-may help us interpret ambiguous events by linking the current situation to relevant prior experiences. Evidence suggests that remindings play an important role in interpreting complex ambiguous stimuli (Ross & Bradshaw Memory & Cognition, 22, 591-605, 1994); here, we evaluate whether remindings will influence word interpretation and memory in a new paradigm. Learners studied words on distinct visual backgrounds and generated a sentence for each word. Homographs were preceded by a biasing cue on the same background three items earlier, preceded by a biasing cue on a different background three items earlier, or followed by a biasing cue on the same background three items later. When biasing cues preceded the homographs on the same backgrounds as the homographs, the meanings of the homographs in learner-generated sentences were consistent with the biasing cues more often than in the other two conditions. These results show that remindings can influence word interpretation. In addition, later memory for the homographs and cues was greater when the meaning of the homograph in the sentence was consistent with the earlier biasing cue, suggesting that remindings enhanced mnemonic performance. Remindings play an important role in how we interpret ambiguous stimuli and enhance memory for the involved material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23835617      PMCID: PMC3865228          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0476-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  Context and homograph meaning resolution.

Authors:  P Dixon; L C Twilley
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1999-12

2.  Role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task.

Authors:  L R Brooks; G R Norman; S W Allen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1991-09

3.  The reminding effect: presentation of associates enhances memory for related words in a list.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin; Brian H Ross
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-03-17

4.  Reminding as a basis for temporal judgments.

Authors:  E Winograd; R M Soloway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The roles of similarity in transfer: separating retrievability from inferential soundness.

Authors:  D Gentner; M J Rattermann; K D Forbus
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Encoding effects of remindings.

Authors:  B H Ross; G L Bradshaw
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-09

7.  Comparison-based learning: effects of comparing instances during category learning.

Authors:  T L Spalding; B H Ross
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill.

Authors:  B H Ross
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  What makes distributed practice effective?

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin; Jonathan Tullis
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.468

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

2.  The role of retrieval during study: Evidence of reminding from self-paced study time.

Authors:  Geoffrey L McKinley; Brian H Ross; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

3.  When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Jonathan G Tullis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

4.  Comparison versus reminding.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.