Literature DB >> 7979785

How a New York cardiac surgery program uses outcomes data.

S W Dziuban1, J B McIlduff, S J Miller, R H Dal Col.   

Abstract

In New York State, a risk-adjusted outcomes system has been used by the Department of Health to monitor all cardiac operations since January 1989. Hospital-specific and physician-specific results are published annually. In this report we describe the experience of one hospital in New York State whose results showed a higher than expected surgical mortality. Staff reactions were initially skeptical, and case reviews found no quality-of-care problems. However, a different approach using statistical analysis of the detailed case-specific outcomes data was more revealing. The excess mortality was localized to patients having high-acuity, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, particularly those who had suffered a preoperative acute myocardial infarction less than 6 hours before, those who were in shock, or those who were in a hemodynamically unstable condition. The staff responded with a focused effort to optimize the management of these patients, resulting in zero mortality for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting during the following year. In the process, staff from all departments joined together in a more collaborative approach to the cardiac surgery program. Outcomes data can be useful for effecting program improvement if comparable norms and open access for flexible analysis are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7979785     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91730-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  13 in total

1.  Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public.

Authors:  E C Schneider; T Lieberman
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-06

2.  The Value of Performance Measurement in Promoting Improvements in Women's Health.

Authors:  Emily C Y Siu; Carey Levinton; Adalsteinn D Brown
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-11

3.  Improving the quality of health care: what strategy works?

Authors:  M R Chassin
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1996

4.  Randomized trial of enhanced profiling in substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Marilyn Daley; Donald S Shepard; Christopher Tompkins; Robert Dunigan; Sharon Reif; Jennifer Perloff; Lauren Siembab; Constance Horgan
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2011-03

5.  The need for accurate risk-adjusted measures of outcome in surgery. Lessons learned through coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  B P Griffith; B G Hattler; R L Hardesty; R L Kormos; S M Pham; H T Bahnson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Trauma emergency unit: long-term evaluation of a quality assurance programme.

Authors:  E Gagneux; P Lombrail; P Vichard
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-03

7.  Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery.

Authors:  J Poloniecki; O Valencia; P Littlejohns
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

Review 8.  The effect of consultant outcome publication on surgeon behaviour: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  M P Williams; V Modgil; M J Drake; F Keeley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Quality in surgery: current issues for the future.

Authors:  Clifford Y Ko; Melinda Maggard; Michelle Agustin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 10.  The impact of Public Reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Campanella; Vladimir Vukovic; Paolo Parente; Adela Sulejmani; Walter Ricciardi; Maria Lucia Specchia
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.