Literature DB >> 21037826

The Value of Performance Measurement in Promoting Improvements in Women's Health.

Emily C Y Siu1, Carey Levinton, Adalsteinn D Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors associated with the use and impact of performance data relevant to women's health.
METHODS: We developed a survey on six levels of information use based on Knott and Wildavsky's (1980) policy utilization framework and used this survey to determine Ontario hospital administrators' use of women's health report indicators. We related responses to this survey to six potentially relevant organizational factors, such as women's health as a written hospital priority, a women's health program and hospital budget size, using correlation and multiple-regression analysis.
RESULTS: Only women's health in a written hospital priority (p=0.01) and hospital budget (p=0.02, log transformed) were significantly associated with the highest level of use when all organizational factors were considered.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the use of women's health performance indicators is strongly related to the size of the hospital budget and to organizational commitment to women's health.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21037826      PMCID: PMC2805140     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  18 in total

1.  Monitoring health reform: a report card approach.

Authors:  M D Brownell; N P Roos; L L Roos
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Grading the graders: how hospitals in California and New York perceive and interpret their report cards.

Authors:  P S Romano; J A Rainwater; D Antonius
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Public release of performance data and quality improvement: internal responses to external data by US health care providers.

Authors:  H T Davies
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-06

4.  How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?

Authors:  John N Lavis; Dave Robertson; Jennifer M Woodside; Christopher B McLeod; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations.

Authors:  J R Kimberly; M J Evanisko
Journal:  Acad Manage J       Date:  1981-12

Review 6.  Making performance reports work.

Authors:  Adalsteinn D Brown; Hamida Bhimani; Hugh MacLeod
Journal:  Healthc Pap       Date:  2005

7.  Performance measurement in healthcare: part II--state of the science findings by stage of the performance measurement process.

Authors:  Carol E Adair; Elizabeth Simpson; Ann L Casebeer; Judith M Birdsell; Katharine A Hayden; Steven Lewis
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-07

8.  The California Hospital Outcomes Project: how useful is California's report card for quality improvement?

Authors:  J A Rainwater; P S Romano; D M Antonius
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1998-01

9.  Performance measurement in women's health: the Women's Health Report, Hospital Report 2001 series, a Canadian experience.

Authors:  Alexandra I Magistretti; Donna E Stewart; Adalsteinn D Brown
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

10.  Stakeholder preferences for cancer care performance indicators.

Authors:  Anna Gagliardi; Louise Lemieux-Charles; Adalsteinn Brown; Terry Sullivan; Vivek Goel
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2008
View more
  1 in total

1.  Algo's Integrated Knowledge Translation Process in Homecare Services: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study for Identifying its Level of Utilization and its Associated Characteristics.

Authors:  Mélanie Ruest; Guillaume Léonard; Aliki Thomas; Johanne Desrosiers; Manon Guay
Journal:  Can J Occup Ther       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 1.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.