Literature DB >> 28447273

Patients' Awareness, Usage and Impact of Hospital Report Cards in the US.

Martin Emmert1,2, Mark Schlesinger3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little knowledge is available about the importance of hospital report cards in the US from the patients' perspective. It also remains unknown whether specific report cards with a stronger emphasis on clinical measures have a greater impact on hospital choice than general report cards that focus on online-derived ratings.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the awareness and usage of hospital report cards as well as their impact on hospital choice in the US.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study by surveying a stratified online sample (N = 1332) to ensure representativeness to the US online population (February 2015).
RESULTS: Overall, 75% of all respondents (mean age 45.4 years; 54% female) were aware of hospital report cards. Among these, 56% had used a report card to search for a hospital, and 80% of report card users stated having been influenced by a report card. Both the awareness and usage of general report cards were shown to be higher than for specific report cards. No significant differences could be detected regarding the impact between general or specific report cards on hospital choice.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that hospital report cards play a considerable role among patients when searching for a hospital in the US; however, patients do not seem to have a preference regarding the type of report cards they use when selecting a hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28447273     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0243-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  36 in total

1.  Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Kai Zheng; Dianne C Singer; Achamyeleh Gebremariam; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Choosing the best hospital: the limitations of public quality reporting.

Authors:  Michael B Rothberg; Elizabeth Morsi; Evan M Benjamin; Penelope S Pekow; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  [Public reporting in health care: the impact of publicly reported quality data on patient steerage].

Authors:  M Emmert; R Gemza; O Schöffski; S Sohn
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2011-08-24

4.  Public reporting in Germany: the content of physician rating websites.

Authors:  M Emmert; U Sander; A S Esslinger; M Maryschok; O Schöffski
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: empirical evidence from the Netherlands.

Authors:  Puck D C Beukers; Ron G M Kemp; Marco Varkevisser
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-10-25

6.  An international comparison of web-based reporting about health care quality: content analysis.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Ylva Ka van den Hengel; A Jeanne M van Loon; Jany Rademakers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Do markets respond to quality information? The case of fertility clinics.

Authors:  M Kate Bundorf; Natalie Chun; Gopi Shah Goda; Daniel P Kessler
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.

Authors:  Ralf Terlutter; Sonja Bidmon; Johanna Röttl
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Assessing Quality of Care and Elder Abuse in Nursing Homes via Google Reviews.

Authors:  Jared Mowery; Amanda Andrei; Elizabeth Le; Jing Jian; Megan Ward
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2016-12-28

10.  A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Thomas Adelhardt; Uwe Sander; Veit Wambach; Jörg Lindenthal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  How do consumers respond when presented with novel doctor performance information? A multivariate regression analysis.

Authors:  Michelle B Hanson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Stuart McLennan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.