Literature DB >> 7972910

Dynamic X-ray compensation for conformal radiotherapy by means of multi-leaf collimation.

J Stein1, T Bortfeld, B Dörschel, W Schlegel.   

Abstract

The application of a multiple fixed field technique employing individually shaped and intensity-modulated beams makes it possible to produce dose distributions of high conformity even in the case of concave target volumes. With the technique presented here arbitrary intensity-modulated beams for the practical solution of the inverse problem can be generated. It is also possible to omit wedges, blocks and compensators in conventional radiotherapy. A continuous unidirectional sweep of independently computer-controlled leaves of a multi-leaf collimator is used to modulate the primary uniform beam. A new algorithm is introduced that computes the leaf trajectories. Also, a method is presented that accounts for leaf penumbra and transmission, which causes the generated fluence distribution to deviate from the desired fluence distribution. An optimization algorithm minimizing this deviation is described. The algorithm calculating the leaf trajectories, as well as the method considering penumbra and transmission and the successive optimization technique are used to calculate examples. Treatment times are calculated and compared to those needed when using compensators. A relationship between the treatment time and the maximum leaf speed is also deduced. To achieve good performance the maximum leaf speed should be no less than 20 mm/s.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7972910     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90103-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  9 in total

1.  [Inverse radiotherapy planning].

Authors:  W Schlegel; P Kneschaurek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Multicriteria VMAT optimization.

Authors:  David Craft; Dualta McQuaid; Jeremiah Wala; Wei Chen; Ehsan Salari; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  To evaluate the accuracy of dynamic versus static IMRT delivery using portal dosimetry.

Authors:  S Clemente; R Caivano; M Cozzolino; G Califano; C Chiumento; A Fiorentino; V Fusco
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Novel, full 3D scintillation dosimetry using a static plenoptic camera.

Authors:  Mathieu Goulet; Madison Rilling; Luc Gingras; Sam Beddar; Luc Beaulieu; Louis Archambault
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dosimetric properties and clinical application of an a-Si EPID for dynamic IMRT quality assurance.

Authors:  Kenji Matsumoto; Masahiko Okumura; Yoshiyuki Asai; Kouhei Shimomura; Masaya Tamura; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-12-04

6.  Investigation of the feasibility of a simple method for verifying the motion of a binary multileaf collimator synchronized with the rotation of the gantry for helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Masatoshi Hashimoto; Masahiro Uematsu; Makiko Ito; Yukihiro Hama; Takayuki Inomata; Masahiro Fujii; Teiji Nishio; Naoki Nakamura; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a review with a physics perspective.

Authors:  Byungchul Cho
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2018-03-30

8.  Proton therapy needs further technological development to fulfill the promise of becoming a superior treatment modality (compared to photon therapy).

Authors:  Daniel E Hyer; Xuanfeng Ding; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Comparison of the KonRad IMRT and XiO treatment planning systems.

Authors:  Bodo Reitz; Moyed Miften
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.