Literature DB >> 7971269

SARs stimulate but do not confer position independent gene expression.

L Poljak1, C Seum, T Mattioni, U K Laemmli.   

Abstract

Two minimal scaffold-associated regions (SARs) from Drosophila were tested in stably transformed cells for their effects on the expression of reporter genes. The expression of genes bounded by two SARs is consistently stimulated by about 20- to 40-fold, if the average of a pool of cell transformants is analyzed. However, analysis of individual, stable cell transformants demonstrates that flanking SAR elements do not confer position-independent expression on the reporter gene and that the extent of position-dependent variegation is similarly large with or without the flanking SAR elements. The SAR stimulation of expression is observed in stable but not in transiently transfected cell lines. The Drosophila scs and scs' boundary elements, which do not bind to the nuclear matrix in vitro, are only about one-tenth as active as SARs in stimulating expression in stable transformants. Interestingly, the SAR stimulatory effect can be blocked by a fragment containing CpG islands (approximately 70% GC), if positioned between the SAR and the enhancer. In contrast, when inserted in the same position, control fragments, such as the scs/scs' elements, do not interfere with SAR function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7971269      PMCID: PMC308471          DOI: 10.1093/nar/22.21.4386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  54 in total

1.  A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains.

Authors:  R Kellum; P Schedl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-03-08       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Specific inhibition of DNA binding to nuclear scaffolds and histone H1 by distamycin. The role of oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tracts.

Authors:  E Käs; E Izaurralde; U K Laemmli
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1989-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Chromatin domain surrounding the human interferon-beta gene as defined by scaffold-attached regions.

Authors:  J Bode; K Maass
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-06-28       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  The 87A7 chromomere. Identification of novel chromatin structures flanking the heat shock locus that may define the boundaries of higher order domains.

Authors:  A Udvardy; E Maine; P Schedl
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-09-20       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites.

Authors:  P N Cockerill; W T Garrard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Chromatin structure of the histone genes of D. melanogaster.

Authors:  B Samal; A Worcel; C Louis; P Schedl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  The sequence-specific nuclear matrix binding factor F6 is a chicken GATA-like protein.

Authors:  Y S Vassetzky; C V De Moura Gallo; A N Bogdanova; S V Razin; K Scherrer
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1993-04

8.  The matrix attachment regions of the chicken lysozyme gene co-map with the boundaries of the chromatin domain.

Authors:  P V Loc; W H Strätling
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Preferential, cooperative binding of DNA topoisomerase II to scaffold-associated regions.

Authors:  Y Adachi; E Käs; U K Laemmli
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  SAR-dependent mobilization of histone H1 by HMG-I/Y in vitro: HMG-I/Y is enriched in H1-depleted chromatin.

Authors:  K Zhao; E Käs; E Gonzalez; U K Laemmli
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  26 in total

1.  Position-independent expression of transgenes in zebrafish.

Authors:  L Caldovic; D Agalliu; P B Hackett
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Matrix attachment regions (MARs) enhance transformation frequencies and reduce variance of transgene expression in barley.

Authors:  Klaus Petersen; Robert Leah; Søren Knudsen; Verena Cameron-Mills
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 3.  Use of matrix attachment regions (MARs) to minimize transgene silencing.

Authors:  G C Allen; S Spiker; W F Thompson
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Nuclear Matrix Attachment Regions and Transgene Expression in Plants.

Authors:  S. Spiker; W. F. Thompson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Modulation of chromatin by MARs and MAR binding oncogenic transcription factor SMAR1.

Authors:  Kiran K Nakka; Samit Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 6.  Dividing the empire: boundary chromatin elements delimit the territory of enhancers.

Authors:  A Udvardy
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-01-04       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Scaffold attachment region-mediated enhancement of retroviral vector expression in primary T cells.

Authors:  M Agarwal; T W Austin; F Morel; J Chen; E Böhnlein; I Plavec
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  High-level transgene expression in plant cells: effects of a strong scaffold attachment region from tobacco.

Authors:  G C Allen; G Hall; S Michalowski; W Newman; S Spiker; A K Weissinger; W F Thompson
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  The heat shock cognate 80 gene of tomato is flanked by matrix attachment regions.

Authors:  A M Chinn; L Comai
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  The beta-phaseolin 5' matrix attachment region acts as an enhancer facilitator.

Authors:  A H van der Geest; T C Hall
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.