Literature DB >> 7968752

Quality of life six months after myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. AUS-TASK Group. Australian arm of International tPA/SK Mortality Trial.

P P Glasziou1, S Bromwich, R J Simes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare quality of life of patients six months after an acute myocardial infarction treated with one of two thrombolytic agents, streptokinase (SK) or recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA).
DESIGN: A cohort study of consecutive patients randomly allocated to thrombolytic therapy and treated in hospitals participating in the Australian arm of the International tPA/SK Mortality Trial (AUS-TASK). PATIENTS AND
SETTING: 776 patients with acute myocardial infarction were asked to complete questionnaires at their follow-up clinic visit six months after the infarct. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two measures were used: (i) the York Health Measurement Questionnaire, which measures activities and distress and provides basic descriptors of quality of life; and (ii) a time trade-off question about the number of years a person would be willing to give up in exchange for returning to full health.
RESULTS: The quality of life of the 714 respondents (92%) was generally high, with a mean index of 0.98. The five main areas causing distress were: lack of energy; breathlessness; anxiety; difficulty sleeping; and pain. In the time trade-off question, the mean number of years respondents were willing to forgo, out of 15 years, was 0.87 years; while 76% did not think it worthwhile to forgo any time. The 8% of patients who declined to answer the questionnaire were in significantly poorer health (New York Heart Association classification, P = 0.01; and Karnofsky index, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in quality of life or time trade-off answers between patients allocated to streptokinase or tPA (P = 0.96 and 0.73, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life six months after myocardial infarction is generally high, and most patients are able to return to normal activities. However, it is significantly impaired in a small group of patients, mainly those with a subsequent stroke or re-infarction. There was no significant difference in quality of life between those treated with tPA and those with streptokinase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7968752     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb127596.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  17 in total

Review 1.  Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques.

Authors:  C Green; J Brazier; M Deverill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The economic impact of Parkinson's disease. An estimation based on a 3-month prospective analysis.

Authors:  R C Dodel; M Singer; R Köhne-Volland; T Szucs; B Rathay; E Scholz; W H Oertel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Quality of life related to fear of falling and hip fracture in older women: a time trade off study.

Authors:  G Salkeld; I D Cameron; R G Cumming; S Easter; J Seymour; S E Kurrle; S Quine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-05

Review 4.  A primer of biostatistic and economic methods for diagnostic and prognostic modeling in nuclear cardiology: Part II.

Authors:  L J Shaw; E L Eisenstein; R Hachamovitch; G V Heller; D D Miller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Streptokinase. A pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in the management of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J C Gillis; K L Goa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: short form 36 scores compared with a normal population.

Authors:  N Brown; M Melville; D Gray; T Young; J Munro; A M Skene; J R Hampton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Predicting patients' utilities from quality of life items: an improved scoring system for the UBQ-H.

Authors:  A J Martin; P P Glasziou; R J Simes; T Lumley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Review of quality-of-life evaluations in patients with angina pectoris.

Authors:  A Gandjour; K W Lauterbach
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Association of time elapsed since the last coronary event with health services utilization.

Authors:  Miguel-Angel Munoz; Josep-María Manresa; Josep Espinasa; Jaume Marrugat
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  A cardiovascular extension of the Health Measurement Questionnaire.

Authors:  A J Martin; P P Glasziou; R J Simes
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.