Literature DB >> 10092560

Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: short form 36 scores compared with a normal population.

N Brown1, M Melville, D Gray, T Young, J Munro, A M Skene, J R Hampton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of myocardial infarction on quality of life in four year survivors compared to data from "community norms", and to determine factors associated with a poor quality of life.
DESIGN: Cohort study based on the Nottingham heart attack register.
SETTING: Two district general hospitals serving a defined urban/rural population.
SUBJECTS: All patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction during 1992 and alive at a median of four years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short form 36 (SF 36) domain and overall scores.
RESULTS: Of 900 patients with an acute myocardial infarction in 1992, there were 476 patients alive and capable of responding to a questionnaire in 1997. The response rate was 424 (89. 1%). Compared to age and sex adjusted normative data, patients aged under 65 years exhibited impairment in all eight domains, the largest differences being in physical functioning (mean difference 20 points), role physical (mean difference 23 points), and general health (mean difference 19 points). In patients over 65 years mean domain scores were similar to community norms. Multiple regression analysis revealed that impaired quality of life was closely associated with inability to return to work through ill health, a need for coronary revascularisation, the use of anxiolytics, hypnotics or inhalers, the need for two or more angina drugs, a frequency of chest pain one or more times per week, and a Rose dyspnoea score of >/= 2.
CONCLUSIONS: The SF 36 provides valuable additional information for the practising clinician. Compared to community norms the greatest impact on quality of life is seen in patients of working age. Impaired quality of life was reported by patients unfit for work, those with angina and dyspnoea, patients with coexistent lung disease, and those with anxiety and sleep disturbances. Improving quality of life after myocardial infarction remains a challenge for physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10092560      PMCID: PMC1728997          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.81.4.352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  19 in total

1.  Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; A Coulter; L Wright
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-29

2.  The SF 36 health survey questionnaire. ...if used within its limits.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; L Wright; A Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-14

3.  The SF 36 health survey questionnaire. A valid measure of health status...

Authors:  D Ruta; A Garratt; M Abdalla; K Buckingham; I Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-14

4.  Use of medical resources and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States.

Authors:  D B Mark; C D Naylor; M A Hlatky; R M Califf; E J Topol; C B Granger; J D Knight; C L Nelson; K L Lee; N E Clapp-Channing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Measuring patients' views of their health. SF 36 is suitable for elderly patients.

Authors:  N Singleton; A Turner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-10

6.  Quality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 3-year follow-up in the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) Trial.

Authors:  S J Pocock; R A Henderson; P Seed; T Treasure; J R Hampton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Psychological rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D A Jones; R R West
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-12-14

8.  Quality of life six months after myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. AUS-TASK Group. Australian arm of International tPA/SK Mortality Trial.

Authors:  P P Glasziou; S Bromwich; R J Simes
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1994-11-07       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

Authors:  J E Brazier; R Harper; N M Jones; A O'Cathain; K J Thomas; T Usherwood; L Westlake
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-18

10.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  58 in total

1.  How much does self-reported health status, measured by the SF-36, vary between electoral wards with different Jarman and Townsend scores?

Authors:  P Marsh; R Carlisle; A J Avery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Multiple chronic health problems are negatively associated with health related quality of life (HRQoL) irrespective of age.

Authors:  H Michelson; C Bolund; Y Brandberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Change in quality of life in the year following cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  J Müller-Nordhorn; M Kulig; S Binting; H Völler; H Gohlke; K Linde; S N Willich
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Quality of life assessment using the short form 12 questionnaire is as reliable and sensitive as the short form 36 in distinguishing symptom severity in myocardial infarction survivors.

Authors:  M R Melville; M A Lari; N Brown; T Young; D Gray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Persistent impaired emotional functioning in survivors of a myocardial infarction?

Authors:  C M Plevier; J M Mooy; P J Marang-Van de Mheen; M E Stouthard; M C Visser; D E Grobbee; L J Gunning-Schepers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Psychological impact of thrombosis in the young.

Authors:  Diletta Fiandaca; Paolo Bucciarelli; Ida Martinelli; Francesca Tantardini; Carmen Clemente; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

7.  Use of the SF-8 to assess health-related quality of life for a chronically ill, low-income population participating in the Central Louisiana Medication Access Program (CMAP).

Authors:  John J Lefante; Gary N Harmon; Keith M Ashby; David Barnard; Larry S Webber
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Stress-induced cardiomyopathy and psychological wellbeing 1 year after an acute event.

Authors:  Angelo Compare; Enzo Grossi; Riccardo Bigi; Riccardo Proietti; Edo Shonin; Pedro Silva Orrego; Lydia Poole
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2014-03

9.  Comparison of the short form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  J Müller-Nordhorn; S Roll; S N Willich
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Depression as a determinant of quality of life in patients with chronic disease: data from Brazil.

Authors:  Luciane Nascimento Cruz; Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck; Carisi Anne Polanczyk
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.