| Literature DB >> 10539395 |
Abstract
Patients with angina pectoris have a reduced quality of life because of their symptoms, impaired activity and anxiety. However, there is no consensus on the best method of measuring quality of life. A systematic literature search of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in angina showed that the most common generic questionnaire was the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) Part 1, and the most common angina-specific measure was the Quality-of-Life after Acute Myocardial Infarction Questionnaire. A comparison of NHP scores with those of the healthy population revealed that patients with angina particularly seem to experience a lack of energy, poor sleep and decreased physical mobility. In the RCTs evaluated, antianginal drugs did not show a significant benefit over placebo in terms of quality of life. As a result of a lack of valid data from RCTs, a strong conclusion regarding the impact of revascularisation procedures on quality of life could not be derived.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1999 PMID: 10539395 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199916020-00003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmacoeconomics ISSN: 1170-7690 Impact factor: 4.981