Literature DB >> 7966677

Predictors of success with neuromodulation in lower urinary tract dysfunction: results of trial stimulation in 100 patients.

E L Koldewijn1, P F Rosier, E J Meuleman, A M Koster, F M Debruyne, P E van Kerrebroeck.   

Abstract

Chronic lower urinary tract dysfunction can be treated by sacral neuro-stimulation. Clinical parameters for selection of patients for this expensive and invasive treatment modality are not well defined to date. Therefore, before implantation of a permanent stimulator, the effect is tested by temporary implantation of a wire electrode connected to an external stimulator. According to the literature, many patients do not respond during temporary implantation and a mean of 25% of the patients with a permanent stimulator implanted fail to respond as well. To improve patient selection, we attempted to define clinical parameters to predict the outcome of sacral neuro-stimulation in 100 consecutive patients who were tested with temporary sacral stimulation. A total of 34 patients achieved a complete cure on trial stimulation. It appeared that detrusor overactivity and urethral instability responded best but they were not predictors of success. We conclude that neither gender, patient age, history nor diagnosis are predictors of success in sacral neuro-stimulation of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7966677     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32311-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  [Sacral neuromodulation in treatment of functional disorders of the lower urinary tract. An overview of basic principles, indications, outcomes].

Authors:  A Bannowsky; C Seif; S Sugimoto; G Böhler; C van der Horst; S Bross; P Alken; K-P Jünemann; P M Braun
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The role of electrodiagnostic techniques in the reprogramming of patients with a delayed suboptimal response to sacral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Mary T McLennan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-03-12

Review 3.  A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  Ash K Monga; Michael R Tracey; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  Philip E V Van Kerrebroeck; Tom A T Marcelissen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Selection of ideal candidates for neuromodulation in refractory overactive bladder.

Authors:  Ravi Kacker; Anurag K Das
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Sacral nerve stimulation for the management of voiding dysfunction.

Authors:  A K Das; M D White; P A Longhurst
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

7.  The Impact of Duration of Complaints on Successful Outcome of Sacral Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Ranjana Jairam; Jamie Drossaerts; Gommert van Koeveringe; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Detrusor overactivity does not predict outcome of sacral neuromodulation test stimulation.

Authors:  Mary M T South; Audrey A Romero; Margaret G Jamison; George D Webster; Cindy L Amundsen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-16

Review 9.  Evaluation and management of refractory overactive bladder.

Authors:  Humphrey O Atiemo; Sandip P Vasavada
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Predictors of implantable pulse generator placement after sacral neuromodulation: who does better?

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Anne P Cameron; Rodger Madison; Christopher Saigal; J Quentin Clemens
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2013-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.