Literature DB >> 21989816

Sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Philip E V Van Kerrebroeck1, Tom A T Marcelissen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the technique, indications, results and working mechanisms of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for lower urinary tract dysfunction.
METHODS: The available literature on SNM for lower urinary tract dysfunction was searched. Based on the information available in the literature and also based on personal experience, the urological indications, technique, mechanisms of action and results of SNM are presented and discussed.
RESULTS: SNM for lower urinary tract dysfunction involves stimulation of the 3rd sacral nerve with an electrode implanted in the sacral foramen and connected to a pulse generator. The technique is accepted by the FDA since 1997. Currently, SNM for lower urinary tract dysfunction has been successfully used in about 26,000 patients with various forms of lower urinary tract dysfunction, including urgency, frequency and urgency incontinence as well as non-obstructive urinary retention. The actual procedure of SNM consists of a minimal invasive technique and is effective in about 70% of the patients who have been implanted with a permanent system. Also, in pelvic pain, interesting results have been described. SNM modulates the micturition reflexes at different levels in the central nervous system.
CONCLUSIONS: Sacral neuromodulation is a safe and effective therapy for various forms of lower urinary tract dysfunction, including urgency, frequency and urgency incontinence as well as non-obstructive urinary retention. It should be the first choice after failure of maximal conservative therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21989816     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0780-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  30 in total

1.  Sacral neuromodulation for the symptomatic treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Craig V Comiter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Changes in brain activity following sacral neuromodulation for urinary retention.

Authors:  Ranan Dasgupta; Hugo D Critchley; Raymond J Dolan; Clare J Fowler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Predictive factors for sacral neuromodulation in chronic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  W A Scheepens; M M G J Jongen; F H M Nieman; R A de Bie; E H J Weil; P E V van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Early sacral neuromodulation prevents urinary incontinence after complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Bastian Amend; G Gakis; P Toomey; A Badke; H P Kaps; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Different brain effects during chronic and acute sacral neuromodulation in urge incontinent patients with implanted neurostimulators.

Authors:  Bertil F M Blok; Jan Groen; J L H Ruud Bosch; Dick J Veltman; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing using permanent leads: a more reliable patient selection method?

Authors:  Thomas M Kessler; Helmut Madersbacher; Gustav Kiss
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: One institution's 11-year experience.

Authors:  Suzette E Sutherland; Ann Lavers; Angeline Carlson; Cindy Holtz; Jyothi Kesha; Steven W Siegel
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Urodynamic study of women in urinary retention treated with sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  Ranan DasGupta; Clare J Fowler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Detrusor acontractility in urinary retention: detrusor contractility test as exclusion criteria for sacral neurostimulation.

Authors:  Paola Bertapelle; Giovanni Bodo; Roberto Carone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Treatment options for female urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Suzette E Sutherland; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.456

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparative pilot study of implantation techniques for pudendal neuromodulation: technical and clinical outcome in first 20 patients with chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  K Heinze; R Hoermann; H Fritsch; R Dermietzel; A van Ophoven
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Therapy of overactive bladder (OAB)].

Authors:  M Kurosch; R Mager; K Gust; M Brandt; H Borgmann; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  The role of neuromodulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder.

Authors:  Aaron H Lay; Anurag K Das
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Sacral neuromodulation in patients with congenital faecal incontinence. Special issues and review of the literature.

Authors:  L Lagares-Tena; L Millán-Paredes; L Lázaro-García; A Navarro-Luna; S Delgado-Rivilla; A Muñoz-Duyos
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  The first Iraqi experience in sacral neuromodulation for patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  Issam S Al-Azzawi; Mohamed A J Al-Tamimi
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-08-07

6.  S3 motor branch stimulation failure due to nerve fiber burning at the nerve-wire junction: A historical technical note.

Authors:  Zahra Emami; Najme-Sadat Moosavi; Majid Karimi; Alexander R Vaccaro; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-02-27

7.  Bladder response to acute sacral neuromodulation while treating rats in different phases of complete spinal cord injury: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ping Shi; Youfang Fang; Hongliu Yu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Does age alone negatively predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation? A single-centre retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Sandra Schönburg; Tobias Bukethal; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence-Recommendations for Day-to-Day Practice.

Authors:  Paul A Lehur; Michael Sørensen; Thomas C Dudding; Charles H Knowles; Stefan de Wachter; Stefan Engelberg; Klaus E Matzel
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-03-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.