Literature DB >> 24102976

Predictors of implantable pulse generator placement after sacral neuromodulation: who does better?

Jennifer T Anger1, Anne P Cameron, Rodger Madison, Christopher Saigal, J Quentin Clemens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Numerous studies have documented a relationship between provider variables, including surgeon volume and specialty, and outcomes for surgical procedures. In this study we analyzed claims data from a Medicare database to analyze outcomes of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) with respect to both provider and patient factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 1997 to 2007 was the data source. Data retrieved included demographic information, ICD-9 diagnosis codes, and CPT procedure codes. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of progression to implantable pulse generator (IPG) implantation.
RESULTS: After stage I testing, urologists were more likely than gynecologists to proceed to IPG placement (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services: 49% vs. 43%, p < 0.0001). After percutaneous testing, gynecologists were more likely than urologists to proceed to battery placement (63% vs.44%, p = 0.005). Among the patient variables analyzed, women were more likely than men to progress to battery placement. Patients treated by high-volume providers had higher rates of IPG placement after formal stage I trials (71% vs. 33%, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of IPG implantation after SNM was greater among high-volume providers. Women had better outcomes than men. Further research may better define the relationship between outcomes of sacral neuromodulation and specific etiology of voiding dysfunction.
© 2013 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Claims data; InterStim; provider specialty; provider volume

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24102976      PMCID: PMC3959637          DOI: 10.1111/ner.12109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  22 in total

1.  Population-based study of relationships between hospital volume of prostatectomies, patient outcomes, and length of hospital stay.

Authors:  S L Yao; G Lu-Yao
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-11-17       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  L M Ellison; J A Heaney; J D Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals.

Authors:  E L Hannan; J F O'Donnell; H Kilburn; H R Bernard; A Yazici
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Internal validation of Medicare claims data.

Authors:  J A Baron; G Lu-Yao; J Barrett; D McLerran; E S Fisher
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  National trends in the usage and success of sacral nerve test stimulation.

Authors:  Anne P Cameron; Jennifer T Anger; Rodger Madison; Christopher S Saigal; J Quentin Clemens
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Sacral neuromodulation for intractable urge incontinence: are there factors associated with cure?

Authors:  Cindy L Amundsen; Audrey A Romero; Margaret G Jamison; George D Webster
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Battery explantation after sacral neuromodulation in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Anne P Cameron; Jennifer T Anger; Rodger Madison; Christopher S Saigal; J Quentin Clemens
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Sacral neuromodulation with implanted devices for urinary storage and voiding dysfunction in adults.

Authors:  G Peter Herbison; Edwin P Arnold
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel; Andrea E Siewers; Philip P Goodney; David E Wennberg; F Lee Lucas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does sex matter? A matched pairs analysis of neuromodulation outcomes in women and men.

Authors:  Laura N Nguyen; Jamie Bartley; Kim A Killinger; Priyanka Gupta; John Lavin; Ayad Khourdaji; Jason Gilleran; Natalie Gaines; Judith A Boura; Kenneth M Peters
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder in women: do age and comorbidities make a difference?

Authors:  Rachel A High; William Winkelman; Joseph Panza; Derrick J Sanderson; Hyde Yuen; Gabriela Halder; Courtney Shaver; Erin T Bird; Rebecca G Rogers; Jill M Danford
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Predictive Factors in Sacral Neuromodulation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranjana Jairam; Jamie Drossaerts; Tom Marcelissen; Gommert van Koeveringe; Desiree Vrijens; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 1.934

4.  Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation in a Privately Insured Population.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Anne P Cameron; Rodger Madison; Christopher Saigal; J Quentin Clemens
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-08-05

5.  Does age alone negatively predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation? A single-centre retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Sandra Schönburg; Tobias Bukethal; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.