Literature DB >> 22116573

Effects of load and training modes on physiological and metabolic responses in resistance exercise.

S Buitrago1, N Wirtz, Z Yue, H Kleinöder, J Mester.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the effects of three different loads (LOAD) in combination with four different exercise modes (MODE) on physiological responses during and after one fatiguing bout of bench press exercise. Ten resistance-trained healthy male subjects performed bench press exercise each at 55% (LOW), 70% (MID) and 85% (HIGH) of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for as many repetitions as possible and in four training modes: 4-1-4-1 (4-s concentric, 1-s isometric, 4-s eccentric and 1-s isometric successive actions), 2-1-2-1, 1-1-1-1 and MAX (maximum velocity concentric). Oxygen uptake [Formula: see text] was measured during exercise and for 30-min post-exercise. Maximum blood lactate concentration (blood LA(max)) and heart rate (HR(max)) were also determined. Number of repetitions (REPS) and exercise time (EXTIME) were recorded and accumulated lifted mass (MASS), defined by REPS × lifted mass, was calculated. LOAD had a significant effect on REPS (LOW > MID > HIGH, p < 0.01). A significant increase of REPS was obtained exercising at a faster MODE except from 1-1-1-1 to MAX (p < 0.01). EXTIME significantly decreased with increasing LOAD (LOW > MID > HIGH, p < 0.01 for all) and faster MODE (4-1-4-1, 2-1-2-1, 1-1-1-1 > MAX; p > 0.01). MASS decreased significantly with increasing LOAD (p < 0.01) but increased with a faster MODE (p < 0.05) with the exception of 1-1-1-1 to MAX. MODE had a significant effect on VO(2) (4-1-4-1 > MAX; p < 0.05). LOAD had a significant effect on consumed O(2) during exercise (LOW > MID and HIGH; p > 0.01) and on blood LA(max) (LOW and MID > HIGH; p < 0.01). The data indicate that physiological responses on different resistance exercises depend on both the load and the velocity mode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22116573     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2249-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  36 in total

1.  Metabolic cost of free weight circuit weight training.

Authors:  S G Beckham; C P Earnest
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.637

2.  Comparison of metabolic and heart rate responses to super slow vs. traditional resistance training.

Authors:  Gary R Hunter; Darryl Seelhorst; Scott Snyder
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Load and velocity of contraction influence gross and delta mechanical efficiency.

Authors:  L S Sidossis; J F Horowitz; E F Coyle
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 4.  Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription.

Authors:  William J Kraemer; Nicholas A Ratamess
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 5.  New fundamental resistance exercise determinants of molecular and cellular muscle adaptations.

Authors:  Marco Toigo; Urs Boutellier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Haemodynamic responses to weightlifting exercise.

Authors:  D W Hill; S D Butler
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Cycling efficiency and pedalling frequency in road cyclists.

Authors:  J Chavarren; J A Calbet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

8.  Efficiency of work performance and contraction velocity in isotonic tetani of frog sartorius.

Authors:  P E di Prampero; U Boutellier; A Marguerat
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Role of the lactate transporter (MCT1) in skeletal muscles.

Authors:  K J McCullagh; R C Poole; A P Halestrap; M O'Brien; A Bonen
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1996-07

10.  Correlated reduction of velocity of shortening and the rate of energy utilization in mouse fast-twitch muscle during a continuous tetanus.

Authors:  M T Crow; M J Kushmerick
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?

Authors:  James R Jauchem
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Lactate Kinetics during Multiple Set Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Nicolas Wirtz; Patrick Wahl; Heinz Kleinöder; Joachim Mester
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Concentric and eccentric time-under-tension during strengthening exercises: validity and reliability of stretch-sensor recordings from an elastic exercise-band.

Authors:  Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Kristian Thorborg; Thomas Bandholm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Changes in the Level of Asprosin as a Novel Adipocytokine after Different Types of Resistance Training.

Authors:  Mohammad Jahangiri; Shahnaz Shahrbanian; Anthony C Hackney
Journal:  J Chem Health Risks       Date:  2021

5.  Oxygen uptake and heart rate kinetics after different types of resistance exercise.

Authors:  Jeferson M Vianna; Francisco Z Werneck; Emerson F Coelho; Vinicius O Damasceno; Victor M Reis
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  The majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction-an assessor-blinded study.

Authors:  Mathilde Faber; Malene H Andersen; Claus Sevel; Kristian Thorborg; Thomas Bandholm; Michael Rathleff
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Comparison of blood lactate and perceived exertion responses in two matched time-under-tension protocols.

Authors:  Salvador Vargas-Molina; Fernando Martín-Rivera; Diego A Bonilla; Jorge L Petro; Leandro Carbone; Ramón Romance; Manuel deDiego; Brad J Schoenfeld; Javier Benítez-Porres
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.