Literature DB >> 2435520

Variability on serial testing of pattern reversal visual evoked potential latencies from full-field, half-field and foveal stimulation in control subjects.

S R Hammond, S MacCallum, C Yiannikas, J C Walsh, J G McLeod.   

Abstract

The change in pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PRVEP) latency over time (test-retest variability, TRV) was assessed in 30 (16 males, 14 females) adult control subjects using full-field (FF), half-field (HF) and foveal (central-field, CF) stimulation. The mean test-retest interval (TRI) was 20.5 months with a range of 18-21.5 months. There were no significant test-retest latency differences in either sex and furthermore there were no significant inter-sex differences in any of the test-retest parameters. Because of the latter finding the test-retest upper limit of normal for each parameter as defined by the mean value + 2.5 S.D. was taken as the largest value obtained in either sex. Thus the test-retest upper limits of normal for absolute latency from FF, right HF, left HF and CF stimulation were 6, 7, 9 and 7 msec, respectively; for interocular latency differences (ILD) from FF and CF stimulation were 4 and 5 msec respectively; and for right HF to left HF intraocular latency difference (IOLD) was 7 msec. It is concluded that the TRV was sufficiently small in our control group with each of the stimulus techniques to make all of them potentially useful in serial PRVEP studies. Furthermore the extra information provided by CF and HF stimulation may increase the sensitivity and accuracy with which change can be monitored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2435520     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90209-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  6 in total

1.  Correlation between full-field and multifocal VEPs in optic neuritis.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; Clare Fraser; Raymond Garrick; Stuart Graham; Hemamalini Arvind
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  When do asymmetrical full-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials indicate visual pathway dysfunction in children?

Authors:  Tessa B Mellow; Alki Liasis; Ruth Lyons; Dorothy Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The pattern visual evoked potential. A multicenter study using standardized techniques.

Authors:  M Brigell; D I Kaufman; P Bobak; A Beydoun
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Reproducibility of multifocal visual evoked potential and traditional visual evoked potential in normal and multiple sclerosis eyes.

Authors:  Divya Narayanan; Han Cheng; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  The reproducibility of binocular pattern reversal visual evoked potentials: a single subject design.

Authors:  Tessa B Mellow; Alki Liasis; Ruth Lyons; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Interferon-alpha and transfer factor in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. AUSTIMS Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 10.154

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.