Literature DB >> 7955074

Translesional synthesis on DNA templates containing site-specifically placed deoxyadenosine and deoxyguanosine adducts formed by the plant carcinogen aristolochic acid.

T H Broschard1, M Wiessler, C W von der Lieth, H H Schmeiser.   

Abstract

Synthetic oligonucleotides (18-mers) containing either a single deoxyadenosine residue or a single deoxyguanosine residue were treated with aristolochic acid I (AAI) or aristolochic acid II (AAII), the main components of the plant carcinogen aristolochic acid (AA). These reactions resulted in the formation of site-specifically adducted oligonucleotides containing the two known AAI-DNA adducts (dA-AAI, dG-AAI) or the two known AAII-DNA adducts (dA-AAII, dG-AAII) at position 15 from the 3' end. Using HPLC chromatography, the oligonucleotides were purified and subsequently shown to contain the adducts of interest by 32P-postlabelling. The adducted oligonucleotides were used as templates in primer (11-mer) extension reactions catalysed by modified bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase (Sequenase). Regardless of the type of DNA adduct examined, DNA synthesis was blocked predominantly (80-90%) at the nucleotide 3' to each adduct, although primer extension to the full length of the template was noted with unmodified control templates. However, 15 nucleotide products, indicating blocking of DNA synthesis after incorporation of a nucleotide opposite the adduct and translesional synthesis products were formed in all cases in different amounts, depending on the adduct structure. When a 14-mer primer together with high dNTP concentrations was used to examine nucleotide incorporation directly across from the four different purine adducts we found that the deoxyadenosine adducts (dA-AAI and dA-AAII) allowed incorporation of dAMP and dTMP equally well, whereas the deoxyguanosine adducts (dG-AAI and dG-AAII) allowed preferential incorporation of dCMP. Molecular dynamic simulations showed that the aristolactam moiety of all adducts exhibit a strong stacking, with the adenine residue at the 3' end of the 14-mer primer. These studies demonstrate that all AA purine adducts provide severe blocks to DNA replication and that the guanine adducts may not be very efficient mutagenic lesions. In contrast, the translesional bypass past adenine adducts of the aristolochic acids suggests a mutagenic potential resulting from dAMP incorporation by polymerase. AT-->TA transversion mutations would be the mutagenic consequences of AA adenine adducts, which are consistent with the activating mutations of c-ras genes found in AA-induced tumours of rodents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7955074     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/15.10.2331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  8 in total

Review 1.  Aristolochic acid-associated cancers: a public health risk in need of global action.

Authors:  Samrat Das; Shefali Thakur; Michael Korenjak; Viktoriya S Sidorenko; Felicia Fei-Lei Chung; Jiri Zavadil
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 69.800

Review 2.  Aristolochic acid and 'Chinese herbs nephropathy': a review of the evidence to date.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Cosyns
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Mutagenicity and DNA adduct formation by aristolochic acid in the spleen of Big Blue® rats.

Authors:  L Patrice McDaniel; Elizabeth R Elander; Xiaoqing Guo; Tao Chen; Volker M Arlt; Nan Mei
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  DNA adduct formation and mutation induction by aristolochic acid in rat kidney and liver.

Authors:  Nan Mei; Volker M Arlt; David H Phillips; Robert H Heflich; Tao Chen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Adenine versus guanine DNA adducts of aristolochic acids: role of the carcinogen-purine linkage in the differential global genomic repair propensity.

Authors:  Preetleen Kathuria; Purshotam Sharma; Stacey D Wetmore
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Balkan endemic nephropathy: an update on its aetiology.

Authors:  Marie Stiborová; Volker M Arlt; Heinz H Schmeiser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 7.  DNA Adducts Formed by Aristolochic Acid Are Unique Biomarkers of Exposure and Explain the Initiation Phase of Upper Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  Marie Stiborová; Volker M Arlt; Heinz H Schmeiser
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  DNA adducts of aristolochic acid II: total synthesis and site-specific mutagenesis studies in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Sivaprasad Attaluri; Radha R Bonala; In-Young Yang; Mark A Lukin; Yujing Wen; Arthur P Grollman; Masaaki Moriya; Charles R Iden; Francis Johnson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.