Literature DB >> 22508110

Mutagenicity and DNA adduct formation by aristolochic acid in the spleen of Big Blue® rats.

L Patrice McDaniel1, Elizabeth R Elander, Xiaoqing Guo, Tao Chen, Volker M Arlt, Nan Mei.   

Abstract

Aristolochic acid (AA) is a potent human nephrotoxin and carcinogen. We previously reported that AA treatment resulted in DNA damage and mutation in the kidney and liver of rats. In this study, we have determined the DNA adducts and mutations induced by AA in rat spleen. Big Blue® transgenic rats were gavaged with 0, 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mg AA/kg body weight five-times/week for 3 months. Three DNA adducts, [7-(deoxyadenosin-N(6)-yl)-aristolactam I, 7-(deoxyadenosin-N(6)-yl)-aristolactam II and 7-(deoxyguanosin-N(2)-yl)-aristolactam I], were identified by (32)P-postlabeling. Over the dose range studied, there were strong linear dose-responses for AA-DNA adduct formation in the treated rat spleens, ranging from 4.6 to 217.6 adducts/10(8) nucleotides. Spleen cII mutant frequencies also increased in a dose-dependent manner, ranging from 32.7 to 286.2 × 10(-6) in the treated animals. Mutants isolated from the different treatment groups were sequenced; analysis of the resulting spectra indicated that there was a significant difference between the pattern of mutation in the 10 mg/kg AA-treated and the vehicle control rats. A:T → T:A transversion was the major type of mutation in AA-treated rats, whereas G:C → A:T transition was the main type of mutation in the vehicle controls. These results indicate that AA is genotoxic in the spleen of rats exposed under conditions that result in DNA adduct formation and mutation induction in kidney and liver.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22508110      PMCID: PMC6595488          DOI: 10.1002/em.21696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  45 in total

1.  Some traditional herbal medicines, some mycotoxins, naphthalene and styrene.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2002

2.  Mutagenicity of aristolochic acid in the lambda/lacZ transgenic mouse (MutaMouse).

Authors:  Arihiro Kohara; Takayoshi Suzuki; Masamitsu Honma; Tomohiko Ohwada; Makoto Hayashi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-03-25       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Aristolochic acid-induced carcinogenesis examined by ACB-PCR quantification of H-Ras and K-Ras mutant fraction.

Authors:  Yiying Wang; Fanxue Meng; Volker M Arlt; Nan Mei; Tao Chen; Barbara L Parsons
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Rapidly progressive interstitial renal fibrosis in young women: association with slimming regimen including Chinese herbs.

Authors:  J L Vanherweghem; M Depierreux; C Tielemans; D Abramowicz; M Dratwa; M Jadoul; C Richard; D Vandervelde; D Verbeelen; R Vanhaelen-Fastre
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Activating mutations at codon 61 of the c-Ha-ras gene in thin-tissue sections of tumors induced by aristolochic acid in rats and mice.

Authors:  H H Schmeiser; H R Scherf; M Wiessler
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Chinese herbs nephropathy: a clue to Balkan endemic nephropathy?

Authors:  J P Cosyns; M Jadoul; J P Squifflet; J F De Plaen; D Ferluga; C van Ypersele de Strihou
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) increased brain mutations in prenatal and neonatal mice but not in the adults.

Authors:  William Slikker; Nan Mei; Tao Chen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Translesional synthesis on DNA templates containing site-specifically placed deoxyadenosine and deoxyguanosine adducts formed by the plant carcinogen aristolochic acid.

Authors:  T H Broschard; M Wiessler; C W von der Lieth; H H Schmeiser
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  The nephrotoxicity of Aristolochia manshuriensis in rats is attributable to its aristolochic acids.

Authors:  Man-Chang Liu; Shoichi Maruyama; Masashi Mizuno; Yoshiki Morita; Shigeru Hanaki; Yukio Yuzawa; Seiichi Matsuo
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.801

10.  DNA adduct formation and mutation induction by aristolochic acid in rat kidney and liver.

Authors:  Nan Mei; Volker M Arlt; David H Phillips; Robert H Heflich; Tao Chen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Stella Tommasi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Toxicogenomics and cancer susceptibility: advances with next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Baitang Ning; Zhenqiang Su; Nan Mei; Huixiao Hong; Helen Deng; Leming Shi; James C Fuscoe; William H Tolleson
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Transgenic rat models for mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Takehiko Nohmi; Kenichi Masumura; Naomi Toyoda-Hokaiwado
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  Aristolochic Acid-Induced Genotoxicity and Toxicogenomic Changes in Rodents.

Authors:  Xi-Lin Li; Xiao-Qing Guo; Hai-Rong Wang; Tao Chen; Nan Mei
Journal:  World J Tradit Chin Med       Date:  2020-03-13

Review 5.  Recent developments in detoxication techniques for aristolochic acid-containing traditional Chinese medicines.

Authors:  Yang Fan; Zongming Li; Jun Xi
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.036

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.