Literature DB >> 17010389

DNA adduct formation and mutation induction by aristolochic acid in rat kidney and liver.

Nan Mei1, Volker M Arlt, David H Phillips, Robert H Heflich, Tao Chen.   

Abstract

Aristolochic acid (AA) is a potent nephrotoxin and carcinogen and is the causative factor for Chinese herb nephropathy. AA has been associated with the development of urothelial cancer in humans, and kidney and forestomach tumors in rodents. To investigate the molecular mechanisms responsible for the tumorigenicity of AA, we determined the DNA adduct formation and mutagenicity of AA in the liver (nontarget tissue) and kidney (target tissue) of Big Blue rats. Groups of six male rats were gavaged with 0, 0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 mg AA/kg body weight five times/week for 3 months. The rats were sacrificed 1 day after the final treatment, and the livers and kidneys were isolated. DNA adduct formation was analyzed by 32P-postlabeling and mutant frequency (MF) was determined using the lambda Select-cII Mutation Detection System. Three major adducts (7-[deoxyadenosin-N6-yl]-aristolactam I, 7-[deoxyadenosin-N6-yl]-aristolactam II and 7-[deoxyguanosin-N2-yl]-aristolactam I) were identified. There were strong linear dose-responses for AA-induced DNA adducts in treated rats, ranging from 25 to 1967 adducts/10(8) nucleotides in liver and 95-4598 adducts/10(8) nucleotides in kidney. A similar trend of dose-responses for mutation induction also was found, the MFs ranging from 37 to 666 x 10(-6) in liver compared with the MFs of 78-1319 x 10(-6) that we previously reported for the kidneys of AA-treated rats. Overall, kidneys had at least two-fold higher levels of DNA adducts and MF than livers. Sequence analysis of the cII mutants revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the mutation spectra in both kidney and liver of AA-treated and control rats, but there was no significant difference between the mutation spectra in AA-treated livers and kidneys. A:T-->T:A transversion was the predominant mutation in AA-treated rats; whereas G:C-->A:T transition was the main type of mutation in control rats. These results indicate that the AA treatment that eventually results in kidney tumors in rats also results in significant increases in DNA adduct formation and cII MF in kidney. Although the same treatment does not produce tumors in rat liver, it does induce DNA adducts and mutations in this tissue, albeit at lower levels than in kidney.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17010389      PMCID: PMC6370021          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  54 in total

1.  Using polymerase arrest to detect DNA binding specificity of aristolochic acid in the mouse H-ras gene.

Authors:  V M Arlt; M Wiessler; H H Schmeiser
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Sequence-specific detection of aristolochic acid-DNA adducts in the human p53 gene by terminal transferase-dependent PCR.

Authors:  V M Arlt; H H Schmeiser; G P Pfeifer
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  A mutator phenotype in cancer.

Authors:  L A Loeb
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Aristolochic acid nephropathy in a Chinese patient: time to abandon the term "Chinese herbs nephropathy"?

Authors:  G Gillerot; M Jadoul; V M Arlt; C van Ypersele De Strihou; H H Schmeiser; P P But; C A Bieler; J P Cosyns
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Urothelial lesions in Chinese-herb nephropathy.

Authors:  J P Cosyns; M Jadoul; J P Squifflet; F X Wese; C van Ypersele de Strihou
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Aristolochic acid impedes endocytosis and induces DNA adducts in proximal tubule cells.

Authors:  C Lebeau; V M Arlt; H H Schmeiser; A Boom; P J Verroust; O Devuyst; R Beauwens
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Analyses of DNA adducts formed by ochratoxin A and aristolochic acid in patients with Chinese herbs nephropathy.

Authors:  V M Arlt; A Pfohl-Leszkowicz; J Cosyns; H H Schmeiser
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2001-07-25       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Urothelial carcinoma associated with the use of a Chinese herb (Aristolochia fangchi)

Authors:  J L Nortier; M C Martinez; H H Schmeiser; V M Arlt; C A Bieler; M Petein; M F Depierreux; L De Pauw; D Abramowicz; P Vereerstraeten; J L Vanherweghem
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Human enzymes involved in the metabolic activation of carcinogenic aristolochic acids: evidence for reductive activation by cytochromes P450 1A1 and 1A2.

Authors:  M Stiborová; E Frei; M Wiessler; H H Schmeiser
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Chronic aristolochic acid toxicity in rabbits: a model of Chinese herbs nephropathy?

Authors:  J P Cosyns; J P Dehoux; Y Guiot; R M Goebbels; A Robert; A M Bernard; C van Ypersele de Strihou
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  27 in total

1.  Decrease of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in rat liver with subchronic exposure to genotoxic carcinogens riddelliine and aristolochic acid.

Authors:  Christine Guo Lian; Shuyun Xu; Weimin Guo; Jian Yan; Maximilian Y M Frank; Robert Liu; Cynthia Liu; Ying Chen; George F Murphy; Tao Chen
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  Mutagenicity of acrylamide and glycidamide in the testes of big blue mice.

Authors:  Rui-Sheng Wang; Lea P McDaniel; Mugimane G Manjanatha; Sharon D Shelton; Daniel R Doerge; Nan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Pretreatment serum pseudocholinesterase level as a novel prognostic biomarker for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Cheng Shen; Jie Jin; Yi Song; Zheng Zhao; Xiaochun Zhang; Gang Wang; Yu Fan; Yue Mi; Shuai Hu; Yun Cui; Liqun Zhou; Zhisong He; Wei Yu; Wenke Han
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Aristolochic acid-containing Chinese herbal medicine and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan: a narrative review.

Authors:  Kathleen G Dickman; Chung-Hsin Chen; Arthur P Grollman; Yeong-Shiau Pu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 5.  p53 mutations as fingerprints for aristolochic acid: an environmental carcinogen in endemic (Balkan) nephropathy.

Authors:  Neda Slade; Ute M Moll; Branko Brdar; Arijana Zorić; Bojan Jelaković
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  Toxicogenomics and cancer susceptibility: advances with next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Baitang Ning; Zhenqiang Su; Nan Mei; Huixiao Hong; Helen Deng; Leming Shi; James C Fuscoe; William H Tolleson
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Mutagenicity and DNA adduct formation by aristolochic acid in the spleen of Big Blue® rats.

Authors:  L Patrice McDaniel; Elizabeth R Elander; Xiaoqing Guo; Tao Chen; Volker M Arlt; Nan Mei
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Subchronic oral exposure to benzo(a)pyrene leads to distinct transcriptomic changes in the lungs that are related to carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sarah Labib; Carole Yauk; Andrew Williams; Volker M Arlt; David H Phillips; Paul A White; Sabina Halappanavar
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Development of a Medium-term Animal Model Using gpt Delta Rats to Evaluate Chemical Carcinogenicity and Genotoxicity.

Authors:  Kohei Matsushita; Aki Kijima; Yuji Ishii; Shinji Takasu; Meilan Jin; Ken Kuroda; Hiroaki Kawaguchi; Noriaki Miyoshi; Takehiko Nohmi; Kumiko Ogawa; Takashi Umemura
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 1.628

10.  Microarray platform consistency is revealed by biologically functional analysis of gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Zhiguang Li; Zhenqiang Su; Zhining Wen; Leming Shi; Tao Chen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.