Literature DB >> 7954086

Active versus passive touch: factors influencing the transmission of somatosensory signals to primary somatosensory cortex.

C E Chapman1.   

Abstract

Active and passive touch, respectively with and without voluntary movement on the part of the subject, are frequently reported to be equivalent in terms of the resultant perceptual abilities. This review reexamines the notion of perceptual equivalence in the light of growing evidence that the transmission of tactile inputs is diminished, or "gated," during the course of active movement. It is concluded that there is indeed gating of cutaneous inputs during active touch. In most experiments, the paradoxical observation of perceptual equivalence between active and passive touch can partly be explained by the choice of task, namely, tactile discriminations that depend on relative, and not absolute, differences in inputs. The surprising lack of evidence for any superiority of passive touch over active touch can likely be explained by several factors. First, performance with active touch may be enhanced by the motor strategy, e.g., by reducing the speed of movement at critical points, and so reducing the degree of gating, and (or) by optimally orienting the exploring digits so as to bring the most sensitive skin areas into contact with the object in question. Second, central influences, including attention and motor set, may be specifically activated during voluntary movement and contribute to enhancing performance during active touch. Thus, the gating influences associated with active touch may be offset, partly or wholly, by the combined influence of these factors to yield (near) perceptual equivalence for active and passive touch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7954086     DOI: 10.1139/y94-080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0008-4212            Impact factor:   2.273


  58 in total

1.  Movement-related modulation of vibrotactile detection thresholds in the human orofacial system.

Authors:  Richard D Andreatta; Steven M Barlow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

Review 3.  The great gate: control of sensory information flow to the cerebellum.

Authors:  Anna Devor
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Low-level static lip force control does not alter vibrotactile detection thresholds in the human orofacial system.

Authors:  Richard D Andreatta; Jason H Davidow; Amy T Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Goal-directed whisking increases phase-locking between vibrissa movement and electrical activity in primary sensory cortex in rat.

Authors:  Karunesh Ganguly; David Kleinfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A cross-modal interference effect in grasping objects.

Authors:  Sandhiran Patchay; Umberto Castiello; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

7.  Modulation of the response to a somatosensory stimulation of the hand during the observation of manual actions.

Authors:  Julien I A Voisin; Erika C Rodrigues; Sébastien Hétu; Philip L Jackson; Claudia D Vargas; Francine Malouin; C Elaine Chapman; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Prior experience and current goals affect muscle-spindle and tactile integration.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neuronal activity in monkey primary somatosensory cortex is related to expectation of somatosensory and visual go-cues.

Authors:  Yu Liu; John M Denton; Randall J Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Haptic discrimination of two-dimensional angles: influence of exploratory strategy.

Authors:  Myriam Levy; Stéphanie Bourgeon; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.