Literature DB >> 7952456

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma.

H B Andersen1, H Baden, N E Brahe, F Burcharth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the indications for and effects of pancreaticoduodenectomy (102 patients) or total pancreatectomy (15 patients) with extensive lymph node dissection performed upon 117 patients for treatment of periampullary adenocarcinoma. STUDY
DESIGN: Presenting symptoms and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were recorded. Cumulative survival rates were evaluated in relation to origin, size, and staging of tumor. Postoperative follow-up of clinical symptoms was done after one year.
RESULTS: The postoperative mortality rate after Whipple's operation was 8 percent (eight patients). The median survival period was 1.1 year and the overall five year survival rate was 15 percent (confidence limits, 5 to 25 percent). The five year survival rate for patients without tumor extension beyond the pancreas was 25 percent (confidence limits, 5 to 50 percent), and in patients with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, 34 percent (confidence limits, 3 to 65 percent). The median survival rate in patients with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater was 3.3 years, which was significantly longer than in the other patients. Fifty-nine patients with distant spread could be divided into 14 patients with para-aortic lymph node metastases who had a significantly shorter survival period than 45 patients without para-aortic lymph node metastases (p = 0.004). Most patients surviving more than one year were doing well, although 60 percent needed exocrine pancreatic substitution therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Resection of periampullary carcinoma provides a better palliation and survival rate than nonoperative biliary drainage or bypass operation. An improved preoperative verification of para-aortic metastases could restrict resection to patients with a prognostic five year survival rate of more than 25 percent and a postoperative mortality rate of less than 5 percent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7952456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  26 in total

1.  Prospective randomized comparison between a new mattress technique and Cattell (duct-to-mucosa) pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Jan M Langrehr; Marcus Bahra; Dietmar Jacob; Matthias Glanemann; Peter Neuhaus
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S P Povoski; M S Karpeh; K C Conlon; L H Blumgart; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Factors affecting survival in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers.

Authors:  Temel Deniz Şeren; Koray Topgül; Bülent Koca; Kenan Erzurumlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-06-01

4.  Adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. A 28-year experience.

Authors:  M A Talamini; R C Moesinger; H A Pitt; T A Sohn; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Gerard J Abood; M Fatih Can; Mustapha Daouadi; Harold T Huss; Jennifer Y Steve; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Michael Stang; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; A James Moser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Prognostic value of lymph node metastases detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic or periampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lennart B van Rijssen; Poorvi Narwade; Nadine C M van Huijgevoort; Dorine S J Tseng; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Isaac Q Molenaar; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Casper H J van Eijck; Olivier R C Busch; Marc G H Besselink
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Conservative resection for benign tumors of the proximal pancreas.

Authors:  Hai Huang; Xin Dong; Shun-Liang Gao; Yu-Lian Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Parenchyma-sparing resections for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Rim Cherif; Sébastien Gaujoux; Anne Couvelard; Safi Dokmak; Marie-Pierre Vuillerme; Philippe Ruszniewski; Jacques Belghiti; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Usefulness of follow-up after pancreatoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater.

Authors:  Laurence Chiche; Barbara Alkofer; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Vincent Rouleau; Ephrem Salamé; Guy Samama; Philippe Segol
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Central pancreatectomy for benign pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Kimberly M Brown; Margo Shoup; Adam Abodeely; Pam Hodul; John J Brems; Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.