Literature DB >> 27346135

Prognostic value of lymph node metastases detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic or periampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lennart B van Rijssen1, Poorvi Narwade1, Nadine C M van Huijgevoort1, Dorine S J Tseng2, Hjalmar C van Santvoort3, Isaac Q Molenaar2, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven4, Casper H J van Eijck5, Olivier R C Busch1, Marc G H Besselink6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatic-artery and para-aortic lymph node metastases (LNM) may be detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic (PDAC) or periampullary cancer. Some surgeons will continue the resection while others abort the exploration.
METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for studies investigating survival in patients with intra-operatively detected hepatic-artery or para-aortic LNM. Survival was stratified for node positive (N1) disease.
RESULTS: After screening 3088 studies, 13 studies with 2045 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included. No study reported survival data after detection of LNM and aborted surgical exploration. In 110 patients with hepatic-artery LNM, median survival ranged between 7 and 17 months. Estimated pooled mean survival in 84 patients with hepatic-artery LNM was 15 [95%CI 12-18] months (13 months in PDAC), compared to 19 [16-22] months in 270 patients with N1-disease without hepatic-artery LNM (p = 0.020). In 192 patients with para-aortic LNM, median survival ranged between 5 and 32 months. Estimated pooled mean survival in 169 patients with para-aortic LNM was 13 [8-17] months (11 months in PDAC), compared to 17 (6-27) months in 506 patients with N1-disease without para-aortic LNM (p < 0.001). Data on the impact of (neo)adjuvant therapy on survival were lacking.
CONCLUSION: Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with intra-operatively detected hepatic-artery and especially para-aortic LNM is inferior to patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy with other N1 disease. It remains unclear what the consequence of this should be since data on (neo-)adjuvant therapy and survival after aborted exploration are lacking.
Copyright © 2016 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27346135      PMCID: PMC4925793          DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  45 in total

1.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Characteristics of 10-Year Survivors of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Paniccia; Patrick Hosokawa; William Henderson; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil; Martin D McCarter; Csaba Gajdos
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Impact of lymph node ratio on survival in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

Authors:  J A M G Tol; L A A Brosens; S van Dieren; T M van Gulik; O R C Busch; M G H Besselink; D J Gouma
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Reappraisal of Nodal Staging and Study of Lymph Node Station Involvement in Pancreaticoduodenectomy with the Standard International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Definition of Lymphadenectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Malleo; Laura Maggino; Paola Capelli; Francesco Gulino; Silvia Segattini; Aldo Scarpa; Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Presentation, treatment and outcome in patients with ampullary tumours.

Authors:  V Bettschart; M Q Rahman; F J F Engelken; K K Madhavan; R W Parks; O J Garden
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group.

Authors:  S Pedrazzoli; V DiCarlo; R Dionigi; F Mosca; P Pederzoli; C Pasquali; G Klöppel; K Dhaene; F Michelassi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Significance of common hepatic artery lymph node metastases during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fernando Cordera; Cletus A Arciero; Tianyu Li; James C Watson; John P Hoffman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate.

Authors:  Caio M Rocha Lima; Mark R Green; Robert Rotche; Wilson H Miller; G Mark Jeffrey; Laura A Cisar; Adele Morganti; Nicoletta Orlando; Gabriela Gruia; Langdon L Miller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality.

Authors:  Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Taylor A Sohn; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Ross A Abrams; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John DeWitt; Benedict Devereaux; Melissa Chriswell; Kathleen McGreevy; Thomas Howard; Thomas F Imperiale; Donato Ciaccia; Kathleen A Lane; Dean Maglinte; Kenyon Kopecky; Julia LeBlanc; Lee McHenry; James Madura; Alex Aisen; Harvey Cramer; Oscar Cummings; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

1.  The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Zhi-Ming Zhao; Yuan-Xing Gao; Wan Yee Lau; Rong Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Study protocol of an open-label, single arm phase II trial investigating the efficacy, safety and quality of life of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with liposomal irinotecan combined with Oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/Folinic acid followed by curative surgical resection in patients with hepatic Oligometastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (HOLIPANC).

Authors:  Florian Gebauer; Alexander Ioannis Damanakis; Dirk Waldschmidt; Christiane Bruns; Felix Popp; Alexander Quaas; Fabian Kütting; Katrin Lutz; Swantje Held; Burkhard Deuß; Tobias Göser
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Predicting Selection Preference of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) in a Chinese Single Center Population: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram.

Authors:  Zhen Huo; Zhihao Shi; Shuyu Zhai; Jingfeng Li; Hao Qian; Xiaomei Tang; Yuanchi Weng; Yusheng Shi; Liwen Wang; Yue Wang; Xiaxing Deng; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-10-26

4.  Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastases in non-pancreatic periampullary cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Hempel; Florian Oehme; Benjamin Müssle; Daniela E Aust; Marius Distler; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.754

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.