Literature DB >> 7951292

Effect of hamstring stretching on hamstring muscle performance.

T W Worrell1, T L Smith, J Winegardner.   

Abstract

The relationship between hamstring flexibility and hamstring muscle performance has not been reported. The purposes of this study were 1) to determine the most effective stretching method for increasing hamstring flexibility and 2) to determine the effects of increasing hamstring flexibility on isokinetic peak torque. Nineteen subjects participated in this study. A two-way analysis of variance was used to compare two stretching techniques: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch and static stretch. A one-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare hamstring isokinetic values pre- and poststretching. No significant increase occurred (p < .05) in hamstring flexibility even though increases occurred with each technique: static stretch (+21.3%) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (+25.7%). Significant increases occurred in peak torque eccentrically at 60 degrees/sec (p < .05, +8.5%) and 120 degrees/sec (p < .05, +13.5%) and concentrically at 120 degrees/sec (p < .05, +11.2%). No significant increase occurred at 60 degrees/sec (p > .05, +2.5%). We concluded that increasing hamstring flexibility was an effective method for increasing hamstring muscle performance at selective isokinetic conditions. Further study is needed to determine if increasing hamstring flexibility will increase performance in closed kinetic chain activities.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7951292     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1994.20.3.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  20 in total

Review 1.  Recurrent posterior thigh symptoms detrimental to performance in rugby union: predisposing factors.

Authors:  L Devlin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Duration of Maintained Hamstring Flexibility After a One-Time, Modified Hold-Relax Stretching Protocol.

Authors:  Scott G. Spernoga; Timothy L. Uhl; Brent L. Arnold; Bruce M. Gansneder
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Phil Page
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

4.  Eccentric Training and Static Stretching Improve Hamstring Flexibility of High School Males.

Authors:  Russell T Nelson; William D Bandy
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Duration of maintained hamstring flexibility after cessation of an acute static stretching protocol.

Authors:  G M Depino; W G Webright; B L Arnold
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Rehabilitation of extra-articular sources of hip pain in athletes.

Authors:  Timothy F Tyler; Stephen J Nicholas
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2007-11

7.  A Comparison of the Immediate Effects of Eccentric Training vs Static Stretch on Hamstring Flexibility in High School and College Athletes.

Authors:  Russell T Nelson
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-05

Review 8.  A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance.

Authors:  David G Behm; Anis Chaouachi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Standing and Supine Hamstring Stretching Are Equally Effective.

Authors:  Laura C Decoster; Rebecca L Scanlon; Kevin D Horn; Joshua Cleland
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Acute lower extremity running kinematics after a hamstring stretch.

Authors:  Autumn L Davis Hammonds; Kevin G Laudner; Steve McCaw; Todd A McLoda
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.