Literature DB >> 7949501

Mathematical examination of dual individualization principles (II): The rate of bacterial eradication at the same area under the inhibitory curve is more rapid for ciprofloxacin than for cefmenoxime.

T F Goss1, A Forrest, D E Nix, C H Ballow, M C Birmingham, T J Cumbo, J J Schentag.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two antibiotics at equal ranges of area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC) exposure to determine if the rate of bacterial eradication differed between these antibiotics.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparison of two previously collected studies of similar patients with nosocomial pneumonia.
SETTING: Hospitalized patients, most intubated in critical care units with nosocomial pneumonia. PARTICIPANTS: Patients treated with either i.v. ciprofloxacin (n = 74) or the i.v. third-generation cephalosporin cefmenoxime (n = 43) were compared for their length of treatment required to eradicate bacterial pathogens from their respective infection sites, using serial cultures from the site of infection. All patients were also assessed for clinical outcomes. Serum samples were obtained to evaluate individual patient antibiotic pharmacokinetics, which were used to model pharmacodynamics of response. The HPLC assay used for each antibiotic had interday coefficients of variation < 10 percent. Serum concentration versus time profiles were fit using the computer program ADAPT II to determine pharmacokinetic parameters for each patient. The primary drug exposure measure that related to response was the AUIC, calculated as steady-state AUC0-24/minimum inhibitory concentration.
RESULTS: AUIC values in the patients ranged from 6.0 to more than 7000, yet the AUIC value was highly predictive of time to bacterial eradication (p < 0.001). Although more than 75 percent of patients eventually achieved eradication of pathogens from tracheal aspirate cultures, ciprofloxacin and cefmenoxime differed significantly in the time required to sterilize these cultures. At appropriate AUIC values (> 250) for ciprofloxacin, the median time to eradication was two days, while cefmenoxime (also at AUIC values > 250) required six days to achieve the same result.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the more rapid in vitro bacterial killing, which is characteristic of ciprofloxacin at optimal AUIC values, can manifest in vivo as more rapid clearance of bacteria from the respiratory tract of patients, even when both agents are controlled for initial antibacterial exposure (i.e., same AUIC).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7949501     DOI: 10.1177/106002809402800707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  15 in total

Review 1.  Achieving an optimal outcome in the treatment of infections. The role of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials.

Authors:  R C Li; M Zhu; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Measures of exposure versus measures of rate and extent of absorption.

Authors:  M L Chen; L Lesko; R L Williams
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Pharmacodynamic evaluation of factors associated with the development of bacterial resistance in acutely ill patients during therapy.

Authors:  J K Thomas; A Forrest; S M Bhavnani; J M Hyatt; A Cheng; C H Ballow; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  The economic potential of dual individualisation methodologies.

Authors:  J A Paladino; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Modeling the response of pneumonia to antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  J M Hyatt; A B Luzier; A Forrest; C H Ballow; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Antibacterial dosing in intensive care: pharmacokinetics, degree of disease and pharmacodynamics of sepsis.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of the in vivo interaction between cefotaxime and ofloxacin by using serum ultrafiltrate inhibitory titers.

Authors:  D E Nix; J H Wilton; J Hyatt; J Thomas; L C Strenkoski-Nix; A Forrest; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Basis of anti-infective therapy: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic criteria and methodology for dual dosage individualisation.

Authors:  A Sánchez-Navarro; M M Sánchez Recio
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Pharmacokinetic profiles of high-dose intravenous ciprofloxacin in severe sepsis. The Baragwanath Ciprofloxacin Study Group.

Authors:  J Lipman; J Scribante; A G Gous; H Hon; S Tshukutsoane
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults.

Authors:  B M Power; A M Forbes; P V van Heerden; K F Ilett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.