Literature DB >> 9145877

Pharmacodynamic modeling of the in vivo interaction between cefotaxime and ofloxacin by using serum ultrafiltrate inhibitory titers.

D E Nix1, J H Wilton, J Hyatt, J Thomas, L C Strenkoski-Nix, A Forrest, J J Schentag.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cefotaxime and ofloxacin and of their combination were examined in a three-period randomized crossover study involving 12 healthy adults. The PK of cefotaxime and ofloxacin were modeled. PD was assessed from the predicted concentrations in serum and serum untrafiltrate inhibitory titers for 10 test organisms. An inhibitory sigmoid Emax model based on the probability of bacterial growth was used, where Emax = 1 and EC50 is the concentration resulting in a 50% probability of growth. The total body clearance (CL(T)) and volume of distribution at steady state (V(SS)) for cefotaxime were 0.236 liters/kg/h and 0.207 liters/kg, respectively, for the monotherapy and 0.231 liters/kg/h and 0.208 liters/kg for the combination therapy. Ofloxacin exhibited PK parameters of 0.143 liters/kg/h for CL(T) and 1.20 liters/kg for V(SS) following the monotherapy and of 0.141 liters/kg/h for CL(T) and 1.16 liters/kg for V(SS) following combination therapy. For the combination therapy, an interaction term, theta, defined the type and relative extent of interaction. The range of observed theta values (-0.033 to 0.067) is consistent with an additive PD interaction according to standards similar to those used for the in vitro fractional inhibitory concentration index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9145877      PMCID: PMC163858     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  21 in total

Review 1.  Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  W A Craig; S C Ebert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Mathematical examination of dual individualization principles (I): Relationships between AUC above MIC and area under the inhibitory curve for cefmenoxime, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin.

Authors:  J J Schentag; D E Nix; M H Adelman
Journal:  DICP       Date:  1991-10

3.  A comparative study of intravenous ciprofloxacin and benzylpenicillin versus netilmicin and piperacillin for the empirical treatment of fever in neutropenic patients.

Authors:  S M Kelsey; M E Wood; E Shaw; G C Jenkins; A C Newland
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Randomized multicentre study of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin versus gentamicin and azlocillin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

Authors:  J N Philpott-Howard; K F Barker; J J Wade; R S Kaczmarski; J C Smedley; G J Mufti
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Comparative study of pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activity of ceftizoxime and cefotaxime.

Authors:  F Vallée; M LeBel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Enantioselective disposition of ofloxacin in humans.

Authors:  O Okazaki; C Kojima; H Hakusui; M Nakashima
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Multicenter, randomized trial of ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin for empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

Authors:  J P Flaherty; D Waitley; B Edlin; D George; P Arnow; P O'Keefe; R A Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-11-30       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Safety and pharmacokinetics of single dose intravenous ofloxacin in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  D Guay; K Tack; S Flor
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Res       Date:  1991

9.  Use of serum ultrafiltrate in the serum dilution test.

Authors:  J E Leggett; S A Wolz; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 10.  A review of cephalosporin metabolism: a lesson to be learned for future chemotherapy.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.803

View more
  7 in total

1.  Modeling of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships: concepts and perspectives.

Authors:  H Derendorf; B Meibohm
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Pharmacodynamic functions: a multiparameter approach to the design of antibiotic treatment regimens.

Authors:  Roland R Regoes; Camilla Wiuff; Renata M Zappala; Kim N Garner; Fernando Baquero; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacodynamic model to describe the concentration-dependent selection of cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sara K Olofsson; Patricia Geli; Dan I Andersson; Otto Cars
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Modeling the mechanism of postantibiotic effect and determining implications for dosing regimens.

Authors:  Patricia Geli
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Pharmacodynamics of non-replicating viruses, bacteriocins and lysins.

Authors:  James J Bull; Roland R Regoes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Combined immunomodulator and antimicrobial therapy eliminates polymicrobial sepsis and modulates cytokine production in combined injured mice.

Authors:  Thomas B Elliott; David L Bolduc; G David Ledney; Juliann G Kiang; Oluseyi O Fatanmi; Stephen Y Wise; Patricia L P Romaine; Victoria L Newman; Vijay K Singh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Population pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Maria Swartling; Anna-Karin Smekal; Mia Furebring; Miklos Lipcsey; Siv Jönsson; Elisabet I Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.953

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.