Literature DB >> 7947104

How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?

D Brewster1, J Crichton, C Muir.   

Abstract

In order to assess the accuracy of Scottish cancer registration data, a random sample of 2,200 registrations, attributed to the year 1990, was generated. Relevant medical records were available for review in 2,021 (92%) cases. Registration details were reabstracted from available records and compared with data in the registry. Discrepancies in identifying items of data (surname, forename, sex and date of birth) were found in 3.5% of cases. Most were trivial and would not disturb record linkage. Discrepancy rates of 7.1% in post code of residence at the time of diagnosis (excluding differences arising through boundary changes), 11.0% in anniversary date (excluding differences of 6 weeks or less), 7.7% in histological verification status, 5.4% in ICD-9 site codes (the first three digits) and 14.5% in ICD-O morphology codes (excluding 'inferred' morphology codes) were recorded. Overall, serious discrepancies were judged to have occurred in 2.8% of cases. In many respects, therefore, Scottish cancer registration data show a high level of accuracy that compares favourably to the reported accuracy of the few other cancer registries undertaking such analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7947104      PMCID: PMC2033548          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1994.428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  21 in total

1.  Long-term survival after malignant glioma. A clinical and histopathological study on the accuracy of the diagnosis in a population-based cancer register.

Authors:  H Ullén; B Mattsson; V P Collins
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 2.  Cancer registration: principles and methods. Quality and quality control.

Authors:  R G Skeet
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1991

Review 3.  Cancer registration: principles and methods. Items of patient information which may be collected by registries.

Authors:  R MacLennan
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1991

4.  Coding of clinical diagnoses. Clerical and medical errors contribute to inaccuracy.

Authors:  A Ferguson; J Murchison; J R Barton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-05

5.  Confidence intervals and interval cancers ... needles and haystacks?

Authors:  F Kee; D Gorman; W Odling-Smee
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.427

6.  Scottish validation study of Cancer Registration data childhood leukaemia 1968-1981. Bone marrow review--II.

Authors:  M Gray; S Glass; O B Eden; I M Hann; B Gibson
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.156

7.  Survey of the eventual diagnosis in 600 cases referred for a second histological opinion after an initial biopsy diagnosis of Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  W S Symmers
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  An audit of the quality of cancer registration data.

Authors:  R Lapham; N R Waugh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  National cancer control and cancer registration.

Authors:  C A Joslin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The reliability of Cancer Registry records.

Authors:  M C Gulliford; J Bell; H M Bourne; A Petruckevitch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  21 in total

1.  The reliability of cancer registry records.

Authors:  M Gulliford
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-06

2.  Is detecting oral cancer in general dental practices a realistic expectation? A population-based study using population linked data in Scotland.

Authors:  M Purkayastha; A D McMahon; J Gibson; D I Conway
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Prognostic factors in women with breast cancer: distribution by socioeconomic status and effect on differences in survival.

Authors:  C S Thomson; D J Hole; C J Twelves; D H Brewster; R J Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Concordance on the recording of cancer in the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency Registry, hospital charts and death registrations.

Authors:  N S Rawson; D L Robson
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

5.  Benefits and limitations of pathology databases to cancer registries.

Authors:  D H Brewster; J Crichton; J C Harvey; G Dawson; E R Nairn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Registration of lung cancer in Scotland: an assessment of data accuracy based on review of medical records.

Authors:  D Brewster; C Muir; J Crichton
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 7.  Improving the quality of cancer registration data.

Authors:  D Brewster
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Is place or person more important in determining higher rural cancer mortality? A data-linkage study to compare individual versus area-based measures of deprivation.

Authors:  Peter Murchie; Shona Fielding; Melanie Turner; Lisa Iversen; Chris Dibben
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

9.  The impact of socio-economic circumstances on overall and grade-specific prostate cancer incidence: a population-based study.

Authors:  K Shafique; R Oliphant; D S Morrison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Active case-finding method improves completeness and accuracy of data reported to the rural Eastern Cape Cancer Registry in South Africa.

Authors:  Nontuthuzelo Im Somdyala; Linda Mbuthini; Borna Müller; Nomfuneko Sithole; Akhona Ncinitwa; Debbie Bradshaw
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.