Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The reliability of Cancer Registry records.

Literature DB >> 8471441

The reliability of Cancer Registry records.

M C Gulliford¹, J Bell, H M Bourne, A Petruckevitch.

Abstract

Data from the Thames Cancer Registry were compared with data independently abstracted from medical records for 466 patients with confirmed cancer of the bladder diagnosed in 1982. High levels of agreement were observed for five continuous variables and for tumour morphology. Data concerning tumour stage did not clearly distinguish superficial from invasive tumours. Cancer registry data were found to be reliable except for tumour stage which may not be clearly documented in clinical records.

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Year: 1993 PMID： 8471441 PMCID： PMC1968346 DOI： 10.1038/bjc.1993.149

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN： 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640

6 in total

1. Hospital case notes and medical audit: evaluation of non-response.

Authors: M C Gulliford; A Petruckevitch; P G Burney
Journal: BMJ Date: 1991-05-11

2. Medical audit, cancer registration, and survival in ovarian cancer.

Authors: C R Gillis; D J Hole; R M Still; J Davis; S B Kaye
Journal: Lancet Date: 1991-03-09 Impact factor: 79.321

3. Studying patterns of cancer care: how useful is the medical record?

Authors: P Feigl; G Glaefke; L Ford; P Diehr; J Chu
Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1988-05 Impact factor: 9.308

4. Assessing the reliability of epidemiologic data obtained from medical records.

Authors: R I Horwitz; E C Yu
Journal: J Chronic Dis Date: 1984

5. Survival with bladder cancer, evaluation of delay in treatment, type of surgeon, and modality of treatment.

Authors: M C Gulliford; A Petruckevitch; P G Burney
Journal: BMJ Date: 1991-08-24

6. Assessing completeness of cancer registration in the north-western region of England by a method of independent comparison.

Authors: U Nwene; A Smith
Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1982-10 Impact factor: 7.640

6 in total

15 in total

1. Preprinted assessment sheet.

Authors: K M Srivatsa
Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 1996-06

2. Medication errors during hospital drug rounds.

Authors: M Wilcock
Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 1996-06

3. The reliability of cancer registry records.

Authors: M Gulliford
Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 1996-06

4. Reliability of data of the Thames cancer registry on 673 cases of colorectal cancer: effect of the registration process.

Authors: A M Pollock; N Vickers
Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 1995-09

5. Clinical oncology information network.

Authors: S J Karp
Journal: BMJ Date: 1994-06-11

6. Concordance on the recording of cancer in the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency Registry, hospital charts and death registrations.

Authors: N S Rawson; D L Robson
Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2000 Sep-Oct

7. Registration of lung cancer in Scotland: an assessment of data accuracy based on review of medical records.

Authors: D Brewster; C Muir; J Crichton
Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 2.506

8. Management of breast cancer in southeast England.

Authors: A M Chouillet; C M Bell; J G Hiscox
Journal: BMJ Date: 1994-01-15

9. Histological confirmation of breast cancer registration and self-reporting in England and Wales: a cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors: E O Fourkala; A Gentry-Maharaj; M Burnell; A Ryan; R Manchanda; A Dawnay; I Jacobs; M Widschwendter; U Menon
Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 7.640

10. A plea for better coding rules for bladder cancer.

Authors: L J Schouten; L A Kiemeney
Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 7.640