Literature DB >> 7938787

The concept of automatic reinforcement: implications for behavioral research in developmental disabilities.

T R Vollmer1.   

Abstract

Automatic reinforcement refers to situations in which behavior is maintained by operant mechanisms independent of the social environment. A number of difficulties exist in conducting an adequate functional analysis of automatically reinforced aberrant behavior. For example, sources of reinforcement are often difficult or impossible to identify, manipulate, or control. Further, the development of treatments is often difficult because many behavioral interventions, such as timeout, involve manipulation of the social environment--an approach that may be functionally irrelevant in the case of automatic reinforcement. This article discusses the problems inherent in the analysis of automatically reinforced behavior and reviews four classes of treatment that are compatible with that behavioral function. The four types of intervention reviewed include manipulations of establishing operations, sensory extinction, differential reinforcement, and punishment. Suggestions for future research are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7938787     DOI: 10.1016/0891-4222(94)90011-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Dev Disabil        ISSN: 0891-4222


  43 in total

1.  A functional analysis of hair pulling.

Authors:  J T Rapp; R G Miltenberger; T L Galensky; S A Ellingson; E S Long
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

Review 2.  An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  C C Piazza; J D Adelinis; G P Hanley; H L Goh; M D Delia
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Effects of increased response effort on self-injury and object manipulation as competing responses.

Authors:  L Zhou; G A Goff
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

4.  The effects of verbal operant training and response interruption and redirection on appropriate and inappropriate vocalizations.

Authors:  Candice L Colón; William H Ahearn; Kathleen M Clark; Jessica Masalsky
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

5.  A multiple-schedule evaluation of immediate and subsequent effects of fixed-time food presentation on automatically maintained mouthing.

Authors:  Jason N Simmons; Richard G Smith; Lana Kliethermes
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

6.  Varying response effort in the treatment of pica maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  Cathleen C Piazza; Henry S Roane; Kris M Keeney; Bobbi R Boney; Kimberly A Abt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

7.  An evaluation of response cost in the treatment of inappropriate vocalizations maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  Terry S Falcomata; Henry S Roane; Alyson N Hovanetz; Tracy L Kettering; Kris M Keeney
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

8.  An approach to identifying the conditions under which response interruption will reduce automatically reinforced problem behavior.

Authors:  Megan L Kliebert; Jeffrey H Tiger; Karen A Toussaint
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2011

9.  Designing and evaluating assessment-based interventions to reduce stereotypy among adults with autism in a community job.

Authors:  Dennis H Reid; Marsha B Parsons; L Perry Lattimore
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2010

10.  Further evaluation of methods to identify matched stimulation.

Authors:  John T Rapp
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.