Literature DB >> 22532900

An approach to identifying the conditions under which response interruption will reduce automatically reinforced problem behavior.

Megan L Kliebert1, Jeffrey H Tiger, Karen A Toussaint.   

Abstract

Response interruption is a common intervention for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement, but this intervention is challenging for caregivers to implement with consistent fidelity. In the current study, we challenged the integrity of response interruption across two participants by examining carry over into conditions in which the procedure was not implemented, by removing the presence of an interventionist, and by introducing delays to implementation. The results indicated that these challenges severely compromised treatment efficacy. Conditions under which response interruption procedures are likely to be effective and possible strategies to increase the effectiveness of response interruption are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automatic reinforcement; carry-over effects; children; developmental disabilities; problem behavior; response interruption; stimulus control; treatment integrity

Year:  2011        PMID: 22532900      PMCID: PMC3196201          DOI: 10.1007/BF03391771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Anal Pract        ISSN: 1998-1929


  21 in total

Review 1.  An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  C C Piazza; J D Adelinis; G P Hanley; H L Goh; M D Delia
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Schedule thinning following communication training: using competing stimuli to enhance tolerance to decrements in reinforcer density.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Stephanie A Contrucci Kuhn; Ethan S Long; Karena S Rush
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

4.  Density and delay of punishment of free-operant avoidance.

Authors:  A Baron; A Kaufman; D Fazzini
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training.

Authors:  W W Fisher; D E Kuhn; R H Thompson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

6.  Functional analysis and treatment of eye poking with response blocking.

Authors:  J S Lalli; K Livezey; K Kates
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

7.  What makes extinction work: an analysis of procedural form and function.

Authors:  B A Iwata; G M Pace; G E Cowdery; R G Miltenberger
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

Review 8.  The concept of automatic reinforcement: implications for behavioral research in developmental disabilities.

Authors:  T R Vollmer
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1994 May-Jun

9.  Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.

Authors:  B A Iwata; M F Dorsey; K J Slifer; K E Bauman; G S Richman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

10.  Assessing and treating vocal stereotypy in children with autism.

Authors:  William H Ahearn; Kathy M Clark; Rebecca P F MacDonald; Bo In Chung
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007
View more
  3 in total

1.  Reducing covert self-injurious behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement through a variable momentary DRO procedure.

Authors:  Karen A Toussaint; Jeffrey H Tiger
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

2.  Positive Behavior Support for Individuals with Behavior Challenges.

Authors:  Meme Hieneman
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2015-04-23

3.  Conducting Behavioral Research with Children Attending Nonbehavioral Intervention Programs for Autism: the Case of Lebanon.

Authors:  Nidal Daou
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2014-08-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.