Literature DB >> 12365737

Varying response effort in the treatment of pica maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Cathleen C Piazza1, Henry S Roane, Kris M Keeney, Bobbi R Boney, Kimberly A Abt.   

Abstract

Pica is a life-threatening behavior displayed by many individuals with developmental disabilities. In the current study, automatic reinforcement maintained the pica of 3 participants. Following functional analyses of pica, response-effort manipulations were conducted in which the effort to obtain pica or alternative items was varied systematically. Several general relations emerged as a result of the study. First, levels of pica were reduced relative to baseline when alternative items were available independent of the effort required to obtain alternative items or pica. Second, increasing the effort for alternative items resulted in increases in pica relative to when effort for alternative items was low. Third, increasing response effort for pica produced reductions in pica relative to baseline when alternative items were unavailable. Fourth, the highest levels of pica occurred when the effort to engage in pica was low or medium and no alternative items were available. These findings are discussed in terms of the relative effects of quality of reinforcement and response effort on behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12365737      PMCID: PMC1284382          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  22 in total

Review 1.  An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  C C Piazza; J D Adelinis; G P Hanley; H L Goh; M D Delia
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Progressing from brief assessments to extended experimental analyses in the evaluation of aberrant behavior.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; B A Marcus; J E Ringdahl; H S Roane
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

3.  Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.

Authors:  L G Bowman; C C Piazza; W W Fisher; L P Hagopian; J S Kogan
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

4.  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  H S Roane; T R Vollmer; J E Ringdahl; B A Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

5.  Effects of wrist weights on self-injurious and adaptive behaviors.

Authors:  G P Hanley; C C Piazza; K M Keeney; A B Blakeley-Smith; A S Worsdell
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

Review 6.  The concept of automatic reinforcement: implications for behavioral research in developmental disabilities.

Authors:  T R Vollmer
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1994 May-Jun

7.  Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.

Authors:  B A Iwata; M F Dorsey; K J Slifer; K E Bauman; G S Richman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

8.  The use of wrist weights to reduce self-injury maintained by sensory reinforcement.

Authors:  R Van Houten
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993

9.  Treatment of pica through multiple analyses of its reinforcing functions.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; G P Hanley; L A LeBlanc; A S Worsdell; S E Lindauer; K M Keeney
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

10.  Utilizing increased response effort to reduce chronic hand mouthing.

Authors:  D S Irvin; T J Thompson; W D Turner; D E Williams
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998
View more
  7 in total

1.  The effects of noncontingent access to food on the rate of object mouthing across three settings.

Authors:  Henry S Roane; Markell L Kelly; Wayne W Fisher
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention-maintained behavior through noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment.

Authors:  Wayne W Fisher; Iser G DeLeon; Vanessa Rodriguez-Catter; Kris M Keeney
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

3.  Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in say-do correspondence.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Systematic Changes in Preference for Schedule-Thinning Arrangements as a Function of Relative Reinforcement Density.

Authors:  Adam M Briggs; Jessica S Akers; Brian D Greer; Wayne W Fisher; Billie J Retzlaff
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2017-11-28

5.  The Role of Context in the Evaluation of Reinforcer Efficacy: Implications for the Preference Assessment Outcomes.

Authors:  Aphrodite Mangum; Henry Roane; Laura Fredrick; Robert Pabico
Journal:  Res Autism Spectr Disord       Date:  2012-01

6.  Delineating subtypes of self-injurious behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Griffin W Rooker; Jennifer R Zarcone
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2015-07-29

7.  Persistence of stereotypic behavior: examining the effects of external reinforcers.

Authors:  William H Ahearn; Kathy M Clark; Nicole C Gardenier; Bo In Chung; William V Dube
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.