Literature DB >> 7936977

Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces.

G J Hole1.   

Abstract

Young et al (1987) have demonstrated that the juxtaposition of top and bottom halves of different faces produces a powerful impression of a novel face. It is difficult to isolate perceptually either half of the 'new' face. Inversion of the stimulus, however, makes this task easier. Upright chimeric faces appear to evoke strong and automatic configurational processing mechanisms which interfere with selective piecemeal processing. In this paper three experiments are described in which a matching paradigm was used to show that Young et al's findings apply to unfamiliar as well as to familiar faces. The results highlight the way in which minor procedural differences may alter the way in which subjects perform face-recognition tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7936977     DOI: 10.1068/p230065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  72 in total

1.  Holistic processing does not require configural variability.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  Smaller holistic processing of faces associated with face drawing experience.

Authors:  Guomei Zhou; Zhijie Cheng; Xudong Zhang; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  Visual prediction and perceptual expertise.

Authors:  Olivia S Cheung; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification.

Authors:  Lun Zhao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Race-specific perceptual discrimination improvement following short individuation training with faces.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; James W Tanaka; Sophie Lebrecht; Michael J Tarr; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11-08

Review 6.  Face perception: an integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Marcos Ruiz-Soler; Francesc S Beltran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-02

7.  Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

8.  The time course of processing external and internal features of unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Bozana Veres-Injac; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-04-18

9.  The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Jarrett D Barker; Shawn Barr; Jennifer L Bittner; Alexander Bratch; W Drew Bromfield; Roy A Goode; Mary Jones; Doori Lee; Aparna Srinath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

10.  Does response interference contribute to face composite effects?

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.