Literature DB >> 7936710

Low Back Pain Rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain.

Claus Manniche1, Karsten Asmussen, Birgitte Lauritsen, Henrik Vinterberg, Svend Kreiner, Alan Jordan.   

Abstract

Low Back Pain Rating scale is an index scale which includes measurements of pain intensity, disability, and physical impairment. The scale was designed to monitor the outcome of clinical trials of low back pain treatment. It has been validated in 58 patients following first-time discectomy. The scale rating can be rapidly carried out and requires no special aids. With slight modification it can be used in office and telephone interviews, as well as postal questionnaires. These modifications only slightly reduce the quantity of information gathered. In the study, a high rater agreement (97.7%) was found without level difference between two observers using the scale. The validation process included: construct validity, criterion-related validity and item bias, relative to Global Assessments pronounced by the patient and an experienced clinician. Low Back Pain Rating scale hs been shown to be valid and reliable in the assessment of low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7936710     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90007-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  75 in total

Review 1.  Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.

Authors:  U Müller; M S Duetz; C Roeder; C G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.

Authors:  U Müller; C Roeder; L Dubs; M S Duetz; C G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Expressing treatment-associated changes.

Authors:  S Chrubasik; C Conradt; A Black
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Modic changes following lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Hanne B Albert; Claus Manniche
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cost-effectiveness evaluation of an RCT in rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a low-cost, behavioural approach is cost-effective over individual exercise therapy.

Authors:  Rikke Søgaard; Cody E Bünger; Ida Laurberg; Finn B Christensen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Costs and effects in lumbar spinal fusion. A follow-up study in 136 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Rikke Soegaard; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Terkel Christiansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Occupational advice to help people return to work following lower limb arthroplasty: the OPAL intervention mapping study.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Carol Coole; Avril Drummond; Sayeed Khan; Catriona McDaid; Catherine Hewitt; Lucksy Kottam; Sarah Ronaldson; Elizabeth Coleman; David A McDonald; Fiona Nouri; Melanie Narayanasamy; Iain McNamara; Judith Fitch; Louise Thomson; Gerry Richardson; Amar Rangan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kristian Høy; Cody Bünger; Bent Niederman; Peter Helmig; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Haisheng Li; Thomas Andersen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Supervised and non-supervised Nordic walking in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a single blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jan Hartvigsen; Lars Morsø; Tom Bendix; Claus Manniche
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Impact of instrumentation in lumbar spinal fusion in elderly patients: 71 patients followed for 2-7 years.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Bent Niedermann; Peter Helmig; Kristian Høy; Ebbe S Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.